PHI vs. TEO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PLDT Inc. (PHI) and Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO).

Performance

PHI vs. TEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLDT Inc. (PHI) and Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PHI vs. TEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PHI PLDT Inc.	0.47%	5.38%	0.79%	11.91%	-31.70%	36.56%	49.47%	-0.35%	-27.59%	14.39%
TEO Telecom Argentina S.A.	0.69%	-7.40%	79.33%	37.87%	6.86%	-15.34%	-39.38%	-17.25%	-54.46%	108.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PHI : $4.56B TEO : $5.04B
EPS PHI : $138.61 TEO : -$392.83
PS Ratio PHI : 0.02 TEO : 0.00
PB Ratio PHI : 0.04 TEO : 0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) PHI : $218.49B TEO : $8.07T
Gross Profit (TTM) PHI : $156.34B TEO : $4.76T
EBITDA (TTM) PHI : $93.22B TEO : $2.06T

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHI achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than TEO's 0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PHI has underperformed TEO with an annualized return of -0.72%, while TEO has yielded a comparatively higher 0.72% annualized return.

PHI

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -8.73%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 16.80%
• 1Y: 3.75%
• 3Y*: 2.55%
• 5Y*: 2.85%
• 10Y*: -0.72%

TEO

• 1D: 5.13%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 0.69%
• 6M: 61.46%
• 1Y: 15.19%
• 3Y*: 36.04%
• 5Y*: 19.73%
• 10Y*: 0.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PHI vs. TEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHI

PHI Risk / Return Rank: 43
PHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
PHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
PHI Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
PHI Martin Ratio Rank: 46

TEO

TEO Risk / Return Rank: 50
TEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
TEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
TEO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
TEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
TEO Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHI vs. TEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLDT Inc. (PHI) and Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHI	TEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	0.23	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	0.91	-0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.11	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.14	0.28	-0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.28	0.63	-0.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHI vs. TEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHI Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the TEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHI and TEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHI	TEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	0.23	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	0.37	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02	0.01	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.02	+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between PHI and TEO is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PHI vs. TEO - Dividend Comparison

PHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.79%, more than TEO's 0.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PHI PLDT Inc.	7.79%	7.61%	7.65%	8.37%	9.47%	4.67%	5.54%	6.86%	2.50%	5.00%	8.26%	7.83%
TEO Telecom Argentina S.A.	0.42%	0.42%	1.91%	3.43%	0.00%	8.90%	5.27%	12.36%	15.08%	3.33%	3.57%	5.28%

Drawdowns

PHI vs. TEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHI drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, roughly equal to the maximum TEO drawdown of -98.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHI and TEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHI	TEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.26%	-98.60%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.67%	-42.81%	+24.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.54%	-54.02%	+9.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.51%	-86.58%	+29.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.09%	-55.88%	+9.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.83%	-53.81%	+13.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.09%	18.76%	-9.67%

Volatility

PHI vs. TEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PLDT Inc. (PHI) is 6.59%, while Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO) has a volatility of 15.56%. This indicates that PHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHI	TEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.59%	15.56%	-8.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.30%	47.96%	-32.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.17%	65.27%	-42.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.87%	54.15%	-25.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.20%	49.55%	-19.35%

Financials

PHI vs. TEO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PLDT Inc. and Telecom Argentina S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PHI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PLDT Inc. reported a gross profit of 30.54B and revenue of 55.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.

TEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Telecom Argentina S.A. reported a gross profit of 751.43B and revenue of 2.73T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.5%.

PHI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PLDT Inc. reported an operating income of 7.51B and revenue of 55.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.6%.

TEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Telecom Argentina S.A. reported an operating income of 91.14B and revenue of 2.73T, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

PHI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PLDT Inc. reported a net income of 4.95B and revenue of 55.20B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

TEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Telecom Argentina S.A. reported a net income of 120.30B and revenue of 2.73T, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.