PHI vs. TEO
PHI (PLDT Inc.) and TEO (Telecom Argentina S.A.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Telecom Services industry within the Communication Services sector. Over the past 10 years, PHI returned -2.32%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for TEO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PHI vs. TEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHI achieves a -13.14% return, which is significantly lower than TEO's 19.38% return. Over the past 10 years, PHI has underperformed TEO with an annualized return of -2.32%, while TEO has yielded a comparatively higher 1.88% annualized return.
PHI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.59%
- YTD
- -13.14%
- 6M
- -14.28%
- 1Y
- -12.54%
- 3Y*
- 0.14%
- 5Y*
- -0.95%
- 10Y*
- -2.32%
TEO
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- 16.96%
- YTD
- 19.38%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 42.89%
- 3Y*
- 39.78%
- 5Y*
- 23.88%
- 10Y*
- 1.88%
PHI vs. TEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHI PLDT Inc. | -13.14% | 5.38% | 0.79% | 11.91% | -31.70% | 36.56% | 49.47% | -0.35% | -27.59% | 14.39% |
TEO Telecom Argentina S.A. | 19.38% | -7.40% | 79.33% | 37.87% | 6.86% | -15.34% | -39.38% | -17.25% | -54.46% | 108.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHI and TEO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 1994 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
PHI:
$3.94B
TEO:
$5.97B
PHI:
$138.75
TEO:
$875.85
PHI:
0.13
TEO:
0.02
PHI:
0.00
TEO:
0.00
PHI:
0.02
TEO:
0.00
PHI:
0.03
TEO:
0.00
PHI:
$220.87B
TEO:
$9.04T
PHI:
$157.99B
TEO:
$6.85T
PHI:
$99.15B
TEO:
$3.30T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHI vs. TEO — Risk / Return Rank
PHI
TEO
PHI vs. TEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLDT Inc. (PHI) and Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHI | TEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | 0.66 | -1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | 1.53 | -2.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.18 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 1.12 | -1.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 2.70 | -3.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHI | TEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | 0.66 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.44 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 | 0.04 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.03 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
PHI vs. TEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHI drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, roughly equal to the maximum TEO drawdown of -98.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHI and TEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHI | TEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.26% | -98.60% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.89% | -38.26% | +15.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.54% | -54.02% | +25.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.54% | -54.02% | +9.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.51% | -86.58% | +29.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.39% | -47.69% | -5.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.85% | -53.81% | +13.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.07% | 15.84% | -5.77% |
Volatility
PHI vs. TEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PLDT Inc. (PHI) is 5.41%, while Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO) has a volatility of 17.70%. This indicates that PHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHI | TEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 17.70% | -12.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.44% | 35.29% | -20.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.96% | 65.39% | -43.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.86% | 54.25% | -25.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.81% | 49.85% | -20.04% |
Dividends
PHI vs. TEO - Dividend Comparison
PHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.01%, more than TEO's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHI PLDT Inc. | 9.01% | 7.61% | 7.65% | 8.37% | 9.47% | 4.67% | 5.54% | 6.86% | 2.50% | 5.00% | 8.26% | 7.83% |
TEO Telecom Argentina S.A. | 0.35% | 0.42% | 1.91% | 3.43% | 0.00% | 8.90% | 5.27% | 12.36% | 15.08% | 3.33% | 3.57% | 5.28% |
Financials
PHI vs. TEO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PLDT Inc. and Telecom Argentina S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PHI vs. TEO - Profitability Comparison
PHI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PLDT Inc. reported a gross profit of 33.46B and revenue of 57.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.0%.
TEO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telecom Argentina S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.80T and revenue of 2.36T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.4%.
PHI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PLDT Inc. reported an operating income of 14.88B and revenue of 57.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.
TEO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telecom Argentina S.A. reported an operating income of 823.75B and revenue of 2.36T, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
PHI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PLDT Inc. reported a net income of 9.05B and revenue of 57.66B, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.
TEO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telecom Argentina S.A. reported a net income of 636.68B and revenue of 2.36T, resulting in a net margin of 27.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PHI and TEO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEO has higher volatility (17.70%) compared to PHI (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHI dropped -95.26% vs TEO's -98.60%.
TEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHI and TEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer