PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHI vs. TIMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PHI vs. TIMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLDT Inc. (PHI) and TIM S.A. (TIMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHI achieves a -15.19% return, which is significantly lower than TIMB's 11.99% return.


PHI

1D
0.28%
1M
-5.93%
YTD
-15.19%
6M
-13.81%
1Y
-10.04%
3Y*
-2.32%
5Y*
-0.57%
10Y*
-2.65%

TIMB

1D
1.12%
1M
-3.22%
YTD
11.99%
6M
16.27%
1Y
23.25%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
19.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHI vs. TIMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PHI
PLDT Inc.
-15.19%5.38%0.79%11.91%-31.70%36.56%7.30%
TIMB
TIM S.A.
11.99%86.96%-33.24%68.57%4.05%-13.46%23.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PHI and TIMB is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020

0.18

The correlation between PHI and TIMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PHI:

$3.84B

TIMB:

$10.35B

EPS

PHI:

₱138.75

TIMB:

R$9.00

PE Ratio

PHI:

7.84

TIMB:

12.37

PEG Ratio

PHI:

0.28

TIMB:

0.74

PS Ratio

PHI:

1.07

TIMB:

1.98

PB Ratio

PHI:

1.89

TIMB:

2.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

PHI:

₱220.87B

TIMB:

R$27.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PHI:

₱157.99B

TIMB:

R$14.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

PHI:

₱99.15B

TIMB:

R$13.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHI vs. TIMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHI
PHI Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHI Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHI Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

TIMB
TIMB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TIMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIMB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TIMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHI vs. TIMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLDT Inc. (PHI) and TIM S.A. (TIMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHITIMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.14

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

0.90

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.87

2.48

-3.35

PHI vs. TIMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHI Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the TIMB Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHI and TIMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHI vs. TIMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHI drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than TIMB's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHI and TIMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHITIMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.26%

-37.08%

-58.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.54%

-25.89%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.18%

-37.08%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.54%

-37.08%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.49%

-22.57%

-31.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.87%

-12.19%

-27.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.54%

9.41%

+2.13%

Volatility

PHI vs. TIMB - Volatility Comparison

PLDT Inc. (PHI) and TIM S.A. (TIMB) have volatilities of 6.80% and 6.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHITIMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

6.91%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.51%

25.53%

-10.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.48%

31.69%

-9.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.93%

31.58%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.79%

32.11%

-2.32%

Dividends

PHI vs. TIMB - Dividend Comparison

PHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.23%, more than TIMB's 8.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHI
PLDT Inc.
9.23%7.61%7.65%8.37%9.47%4.67%5.54%6.86%2.50%5.00%8.26%7.83%
TIMB
TIM S.A.
8.41%11.67%6.03%4.98%4.05%3.43%3.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PHI vs. TIMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PLDT Inc. and TIM S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
57.66B
6.81B
(PHI) Total Revenue
(TIMB) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PHI values in PHP, TIMB values in BRL

PHI vs. TIMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PLDT Inc. and TIM S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
58.0%
52.4%
Portfolio components
PHI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PLDT Inc. reported a gross profit of 33.46B and revenue of 57.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.0%.

TIMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TIM S.A. reported a gross profit of 3.56B and revenue of 6.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.

PHI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PLDT Inc. reported an operating income of 14.88B and revenue of 57.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.

TIMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TIM S.A. reported an operating income of 1.57B and revenue of 6.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.

PHI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PLDT Inc. reported a net income of 9.05B and revenue of 57.66B, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.

TIMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TIM S.A. reported a net income of 817.09M and revenue of 6.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PHI and TIMB have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIMB has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to PHI (6.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHI dropped -95.26% vs TIMB's -37.08%.

TIMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHI and TIMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer