PHGP.L vs. COFF.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PHGP.L (WisdomTree Physical Gold) and COFF.L (WisdomTree Coffee) are both exchange-traded funds - PHGP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while COFF.L is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Coffee. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PHGP.L returned 14.02%/yr vs 5.33%/yr for COFF.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PHGP.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COFF.L.

Performance

PHGP.L vs. COFF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Physical Gold (PHGP.L) and WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PHGP.L is traded in GBp, while COFF.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COFF.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHGP.L achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly higher than COFF.L's -25.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PHGP.L has outperformed COFF.L with an annualized return of 14.02%, while COFF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.33% annualized return.

PHGP.L

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: -1.41%
• YTD: 3.81%
• 6M: 5.28%
• 1Y: 33.28%
• 3Y*: 27.79%
• 5Y*: 19.54%
• 10Y*: 14.02%

COFF.L

• 1D: -2.94%
• 1M: -14.84%
• YTD: -25.95%
• 6M: -31.86%
• 1Y: -16.33%
• 3Y*: 21.51%
• 5Y*: 18.75%
• 10Y*: 5.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHGP.L vs. COFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PHGP.L WisdomTree Physical Gold	3.81%	53.14%	27.85%	6.97%	11.52%	-3.11%	19.74%	14.47%	4.18%	1.55%
COFF.L WisdomTree Coffee	-25.95%	20.62%	77.97%	18.30%	-11.58%	64.66%	-14.83%	9.37%	-22.80%	-24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PHGP.L and COFF.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2007	0.13

The correlation between PHGP.L and COFF.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PHGP.L vs. COFF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHGP.L

PHGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 39
PHGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
PHGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
PHGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PHGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
PHGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

COFF.L

COFF.L Risk / Return Rank: 5
COFF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
COFF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
COFF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5
COFF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
COFF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHGP.L vs. COFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Gold (PHGP.L) and WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHGP.L	COFF.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	-0.48	+1.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	-0.48	+2.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.95	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	-0.46	+2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.96	-0.92	+5.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHGP.L vs. COFF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHGP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the COFF.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHGP.L and COFF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHGP.L	COFF.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	-0.48	+1.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.21	0.55	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.17	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.02	+0.64

Drawdowns

PHGP.L vs. COFF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHGP.L drawdown since its inception was -42.06%, smaller than the maximum COFF.L drawdown of -84.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHGP.L and COFF.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHGP.L	COFF.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.06%	-84.41%	+42.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.49%	-35.48%	+17.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.49%	-37.56%	+20.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.49%	-42.49%	+25.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.37%	-64.65%	+42.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.07%	-50.01%	+33.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.50%	-53.57%	+40.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.69%	17.71%	-11.02%

Volatility

PHGP.L vs. COFF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Physical Gold (PHGP.L) is 5.10%, while WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that PHGP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHGP.L	COFF.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.10%	8.60%	-3.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.93%	21.58%	-1.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.05%	34.18%	-11.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.21%	34.93%	-18.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.80%	31.97%	-16.17%

PHGP.L vs. COFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHGP.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than COFF.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

PHGP.L vs. COFF.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PHGP.L nor COFF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHGP.L and COFF.L in my portfolio?

PHGP.L and COFF.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PHGP.L or COFF.L?

On fees, PHGP.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PHGP.L or COFF.L?

PHGP.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COFF.L.

What is the main difference between PHGP.L and COFF.L?

PHGP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while COFF.L is Agricultural Commodities. PHGP.L tracks Gold, while COFF.L tracks Bloomberg Coffee. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PHGP.L and 0.49% for COFF.L.