PHDG vs. SPHQ
PHDG (Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PHDG is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PHDG returned 7.32%/yr vs 15.04%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PHDG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
PHDG vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PHDG having a 15.43% return and SPHQ slightly higher at 16.16%. Over the past 10 years, PHDG has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 7.32%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.
PHDG
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 6M
- 13.92%
- 1Y
- 26.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 7.32%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.83%
- 5Y*
- 14.67%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
PHDG vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 15.43% | 2.72% | 10.95% | 8.18% | -14.09% | 15.67% | 18.97% | 8.57% | -2.44% | 15.89% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.16% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHDG and SPHQ is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2012 | 0.62 |
The correlation between PHDG and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
PHDG vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PHDG
SPHQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
PHDG
SPHQ
Financial Services
PHDG
SPHQ
Communication Services
PHDG
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
PHDG
SPHQ
Healthcare
PHDG
SPHQ
Industrials
PHDG
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
PHDG
SPHQ
Energy
PHDG
SPHQ
Utilities
PHDG
SPHQ
Real Estate
PHDG
SPHQ
-
Basic Materials
PHDG
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHDG vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PHDG
SPHQ
PHDG vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHDG | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.32 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.65 | 2.67 | +4.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.46 | 11.39 | +17.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHDG | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03 | 1.89 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.90 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.84 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.53 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
PHDG vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHDG drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHDG and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHDG | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.70% | -57.83% | +40.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.52% | -8.90% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.78% | -16.57% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.06% | -25.04% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.06% | -31.60% | +14.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -10.70% | +4.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 2.08% | -1.13% |
Volatility
PHDG vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHDG | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 3.33% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.77% | 10.18% | -3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.91% | 12.62% | -3.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 16.45% | -5.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.93% | 17.86% | -5.93% |
PHDG vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHDG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHDG vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
PHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than SPHQ's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 1.84% | 2.10% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 1.35% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 1.80% | 1.56% | 1.83% | 2.29% | 1.64% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHDG and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to PHDG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHDG dropped -17.70% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.04% vs 7.32% for PHDG. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PHDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.04% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PHDG.
PHDG has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.03% for SPHQ.
PHDG is categorized as Equity Hedged, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PHDG tracks S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PHDG and 0.15% for SPHQ.
PHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHDG and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer