PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHDG vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHDG vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PHDG having a 15.43% return and SPHQ slightly higher at 16.16%. Over the past 10 years, PHDG has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 7.32%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.


PHDG

1D
1.44%
1M
5.27%
YTD
15.43%
6M
13.92%
1Y
26.83%
3Y*
11.64%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
7.32%

SPHQ

1D
0.59%
1M
6.34%
YTD
16.16%
6M
16.98%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
14.67%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHDG vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
15.43%2.72%10.95%8.18%-14.09%15.67%18.97%8.57%-2.44%15.89%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
16.16%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PHDG and SPHQ is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2012

0.62

The correlation between PHDG and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

PHDG vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PHDG
SPHQ

Technology

35.1%
28.1%

Financial Services

11.9%
13.3%

Communication Services

11.0%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
4.6%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.4%

Industrials

8.3%
24.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
15.4%

Energy

3.6%
0.7%

Utilities

2.4%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.2%

Technology

PHDG
35.1%
SPHQ
28.1%

Financial Services

PHDG
11.9%
SPHQ
13.3%

Communication Services

PHDG
11.0%
SPHQ
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PHDG
10.1%
SPHQ
4.6%

Healthcare

PHDG
8.7%
SPHQ
8.4%

Industrials

PHDG
8.3%
SPHQ
24.3%

Consumer Defensive

PHDG
5.0%
SPHQ
15.4%

Energy

PHDG
3.6%
SPHQ
0.7%

Utilities

PHDG
2.4%
SPHQ
1.0%

Real Estate

PHDG
1.9%
SPHQ

-

Basic Materials

PHDG
1.8%
SPHQ
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHDG vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHDG
PHDG Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHDG vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHDGSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.32

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.65

2.67

+4.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.46

11.39

+17.07

PHDG vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHDG Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHDG and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHDGSPHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

1.89

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.90

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.84

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.53

+0.01

Drawdowns

PHDG vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHDG drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHDG and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHDGSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.70%

-57.83%

+40.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-8.90%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.78%

-16.57%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.06%

-25.04%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.06%

-31.60%

+14.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-10.70%

+4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

2.08%

-1.13%

Volatility

PHDG vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHDGSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.33%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

10.18%

-3.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.91%

12.62%

-3.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.94%

16.45%

-5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.93%

17.86%

-5.93%

PHDG vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHDG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHDG vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

PHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than SPHQ's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
1.84%2.10%1.94%1.93%1.35%0.44%0.63%1.80%1.56%1.83%2.29%1.64%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.03%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHDG and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHQ has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to PHDG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHDG dropped -17.70% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.04% vs 7.32% for PHDG. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PHDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.04% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PHDG.

PHDG has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.03% for SPHQ.

PHDG is categorized as Equity Hedged, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PHDG tracks S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PHDG and 0.15% for SPHQ.

PHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHDG and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer