PH vs. SWK
PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) and SWK (Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — PH in Specialty Industrial Machinery, SWK in Tools & Accessories. Over the past 10 years, PH returned 25.12%/yr vs -0.15%/yr for SWK. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PH vs. SWK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than SWK's 15.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed SWK with an annualized return of 25.12%, while SWK has yielded a comparatively lower -0.15% annualized return.
PH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 39.33%
- 3Y*
- 36.33%
- 5Y*
- 26.12%
- 10Y*
- 25.12%
SWK
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 12.48%
- YTD
- 15.04%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 33.97%
- 3Y*
- 1.97%
- 5Y*
- -13.22%
- 10Y*
- -0.15%
PH vs. SWK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 3.21% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 15.04% | -3.17% | -15.19% | 35.55% | -58.92% | 7.28% | 9.73% | 41.18% | -28.13% | 50.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between PH and SWK is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.48 |
The correlation between PH and SWK shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.65 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PH:
$27.11
SWK:
$2.65
PH:
33.33
SWK:
31.61
PH:
5.53
SWK:
0.84
PH:
$20.99B
SWK:
$15.13B
PH:
$7.81B
SWK:
$4.52B
PH:
$5.31B
SWK:
$1.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PH vs. SWK — Risk / Return Rank
PH
SWK
PH vs. SWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PH | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.16 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 1.14 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 2.54 | +3.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PH vs. SWK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, smaller than the maximum SWK drawdown of -71.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and SWK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PH | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.92% | -71.31% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -26.14% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.79% | -48.31% | +21.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | -69.86% | +41.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.68% | -71.31% | +16.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.49% | -54.51% | +43.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -19.46% | +4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.52% | 11.75% | -5.23% |
Volatility
PH vs. SWK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 7.58%, while Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) has a volatility of 10.14%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PH | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 10.14% | -2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.96% | 27.24% | -8.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.10% | 37.82% | -12.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 37.71% | -9.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.70% | 36.69% | -4.99% |
Dividends
PH vs. SWK - Dividend Comparison
PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than SWK's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.82% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 3.97% | 4.44% | 4.06% | 3.28% | 4.23% | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 1.43% | 1.97% | 2.01% |
Financials
PH vs. SWK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PH vs. SWK - Profitability Comparison
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
SWK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 3.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.2%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
SWK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported an operating income of 366.80M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
SWK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a net income of 158.20M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PH and SWK have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWK has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to PH (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs SWK's -71.31%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PH and SWK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer