PH vs. SLV
PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) is a stock, while SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 10 years, PH returned 24.20%/yr vs 15.63%/yr for SLV. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PH vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 24.20%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 15.63% annualized return.
PH
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 32.27%
- 3Y*
- 38.72%
- 5Y*
- 24.66%
- 10Y*
- 24.20%
SLV
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 29.40%
- 1Y
- 113.72%
- 3Y*
- 45.73%
- 5Y*
- 21.04%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
PH vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | -0.36% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 3.97% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PH and SLV is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PH vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
PH
SLV
PH vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PH | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 2.69 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | 5.76 | -0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PH | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.94 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.58 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.49 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.25 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
PH vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PH | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.92% | -76.28% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -42.45% | +23.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.79% | -42.45% | +15.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | -42.45% | +13.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.68% | -42.81% | -11.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.55% | -36.57% | +22.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -44.67% | +29.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.22% | 19.81% | -13.59% |
Volatility
PH vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 6.71%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.34%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PH | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 16.34% | -9.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.61% | 58.31% | -39.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.59% | 58.90% | -34.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.61% | 36.15% | -7.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.67% | 31.83% | -0.16% |
Dividends
PH vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.85% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PH and SLV have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to PH (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs SLV's -76.28%.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PH and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer