PH vs. RDVY
PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) is a stock, while RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the past 10 years, PH returned 25.12%/yr vs 16.29%/yr for RDVY. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PH vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 13.41% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 25.12%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively lower 16.29% annualized return.
PH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 39.33%
- 3Y*
- 36.33%
- 5Y*
- 26.12%
- 10Y*
- 25.12%
RDVY
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 13.41%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- 31.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- 16.29%
PH vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 3.21% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 13.41% | 18.90% | 16.41% | 20.38% | -13.27% | 31.14% | 13.47% | 37.71% | -9.92% | 22.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between PH and RDVY is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014 | 0.72 |
The correlation between PH and RDVY shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.74 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PH vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank
PH
RDVY
PH vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PH | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.36 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 3.26 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 13.71 | -8.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PH vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and RDVY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PH | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.92% | -40.60% | -26.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -9.04% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.79% | -19.11% | -7.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | -25.32% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.68% | -40.60% | -14.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.49% | 0.00% | -11.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -4.99% | -10.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.52% | 2.15% | +4.37% |
Volatility
PH vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 5.04%. This indicates that PH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PH | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 5.04% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.96% | 11.50% | +7.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.10% | 14.48% | +10.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 18.98% | +9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.70% | 21.13% | +10.57% |
Dividends
PH vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison
PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than RDVY's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.82% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 0.89% | 1.11% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.25% | 2.07% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PH and RDVY have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PH has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to RDVY (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs RDVY's -40.60%.
RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PH and RDVY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer