PH vs. LEG
PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) and LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) are both stocks. PH operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, PH returned 25.12%/yr vs -11.06%/yr for LEG. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PH vs. LEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly higher than LEG's -3.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 25.12%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -11.06% annualized return.
PH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 39.33%
- 3Y*
- 36.33%
- 5Y*
- 26.12%
- 10Y*
- 25.12%
LEG
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 15.59%
- YTD
- -3.16%
- 6M
- -7.69%
- 1Y
- 16.39%
- 3Y*
- -27.77%
- 5Y*
- -24.81%
- 10Y*
- -11.06%
PH vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 3.21% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | -3.16% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between PH and LEG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.42 |
The correlation between PH and LEG shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.54 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PH:
$115.65B
LEG:
$1.49B
PH:
$27.11
LEG:
$1.60
PH:
33.33
LEG:
6.62
PH:
5.53
LEG:
0.49
PH:
7.43
LEG:
1.44
PH:
$20.99B
LEG:
$3.03B
PH:
$7.81B
LEG:
$717.40M
PH:
$5.31B
LEG:
$433.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PH vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank
PH
LEG
PH vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PH | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.09 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 0.44 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 0.90 | +4.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PH vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and LEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PH | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.92% | -86.41% | +19.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -28.51% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.79% | -77.26% | +50.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | -84.96% | +56.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.68% | -86.41% | +31.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.49% | -77.60% | +66.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -19.65% | +4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.52% | 13.77% | -7.25% |
Volatility
PH vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 7.58%, while Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a volatility of 11.98%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PH | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 11.98% | -4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.96% | 31.40% | -12.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.10% | 49.76% | -24.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 42.50% | -13.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.70% | 39.81% | -8.11% |
Dividends
PH vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison
PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than LEG's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 1.42% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.82% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
PH vs. LEG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PH and LEG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to PH (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs LEG's -86.41%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PH and LEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer