PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PH vs. ITT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PH vs. ITT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and ITT Inc. (ITT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than ITT's 9.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed ITT with an annualized return of 25.12%, while ITT has yielded a comparatively lower 19.85% annualized return.


PH

1D
0.12%
1M
4.72%
YTD
3.21%
6M
2.52%
1Y
39.33%
3Y*
36.33%
5Y*
26.12%
10Y*
25.12%

ITT

1D
2.23%
1M
-2.60%
YTD
9.44%
6M
9.25%
1Y
26.71%
3Y*
30.13%
5Y*
16.50%
10Y*
19.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PH vs. ITT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
3.21%39.54%39.58%60.81%-6.91%18.30%34.78%40.75%-24.00%44.91%
ITT
ITT Inc.
9.44%22.52%20.86%48.91%-19.50%33.95%5.47%54.60%-8.66%40.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PH and ITT is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1995

0.59

The correlation between PH and ITT shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PH:

$115.65B

ITT:

$16.61B

EPS

PH:

$27.11

ITT:

$5.58

PE Ratio

PH:

33.33

ITT:

33.91

PEG Ratio

PH:

1.41

ITT:

2.38

PS Ratio

PH:

5.53

ITT:

3.66

PB Ratio

PH:

7.43

ITT:

3.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

PH:

$20.99B

ITT:

$4.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PH:

$7.81B

ITT:

$1.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

PH:

$5.31B

ITT:

$793.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PH vs. ITT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PH
PH Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PH Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PH Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ITT
ITT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ITT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ITT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PH vs. ITT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and ITT Inc. (ITT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHITTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.18

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.52

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.64

3.88

+1.76

PH vs. ITT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PH Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the ITT Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PH and ITT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PH vs. ITT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, smaller than the maximum ITT drawdown of -74.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and ITT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHITTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.92%

-74.46%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-16.73%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.79%

-29.09%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.64%

-37.97%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.68%

-49.52%

-5.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.49%

-14.51%

+3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.33%

-18.95%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.52%

6.54%

-0.02%

Volatility

PH vs. ITT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 7.58%, while ITT Inc. (ITT) has a volatility of 9.01%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHITTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

9.01%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.96%

22.19%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.10%

30.02%

-4.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.68%

29.22%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.70%

31.92%

-0.22%

Dividends

PH vs. ITT - Dividend Comparison

PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than ITT's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITT
ITT Inc.
0.78%0.81%0.89%0.97%1.30%0.86%0.88%0.80%1.11%0.96%1.29%1.30%
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
0.82%0.80%1.00%1.25%1.73%1.25%1.29%1.65%1.97%1.32%1.80%2.60%

Financials

PH vs. ITT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and ITT Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
5.49B
1.21B
(PH) Total Revenue
(ITT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PH vs. ITT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and ITT Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
35.4%
Portfolio components
PH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

ITT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported a gross profit of 428.80M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.4%.

PH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.

ITT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported an operating income of 141.20M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

PH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.

ITT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported a net income of 78.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PH and ITT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITT has higher volatility (9.01%) compared to PH (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs ITT's -74.46%.

PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PH and ITT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer