PH vs. FUL
PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) and FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) are both stocks. PH operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, PH returned 25.75%/yr vs 3.34%/yr for FUL. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PH vs. FUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly higher than FUL's -5.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed FUL with an annualized return of 25.75%, while FUL has yielded a comparatively lower 3.34% annualized return.
PH
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 1Y
- 35.63%
- 3Y*
- 35.53%
- 5Y*
- 26.90%
- 10Y*
- 25.75%
FUL
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -12.09%
- 6M
- -13.96%
- YTD
- -5.25%
- 1Y
- -10.17%
- 3Y*
- -5.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
PH vs. FUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 9.82% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | -5.25% | -10.46% | -16.19% | 14.97% | -10.59% | 57.84% | 2.15% | 22.42% | -19.84% | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between PH and FUL is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.42 |
The correlation between PH and FUL shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.61 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PH:
$121.20B
FUL:
$3.01B
PH:
$27.15
FUL:
$3.36
PH:
35.40
FUL:
16.65
PH:
5.87
FUL:
0.88
PH:
7.90
FUL:
1.48
PH:
$20.99B
FUL:
$3.51B
PH:
$7.81B
FUL:
$1.14B
PH:
$5.31B
FUL:
$511.88M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PH vs. FUL — Risk / Return Rank
PH
FUL
PH vs. FUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PH | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.97 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | -0.42 | +2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.33 | -1.26 | +6.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PH vs. FUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, roughly equal to the maximum FUL drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and FUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PH | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.92% | -68.25% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -26.97% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.79% | -43.45% | +16.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | -43.45% | +14.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.68% | -56.29% | +1.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.82% | -33.40% | +27.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -18.78% | +3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.73% | 9.16% | -2.43% |
Volatility
PH vs. FUL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 7.92%, while H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) has a volatility of 11.36%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PH | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 11.36% | -3.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.35% | 28.21% | -8.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.35% | 33.74% | -8.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.69% | 29.70% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.59% | 31.17% | +0.42% |
Dividends
PH vs. FUL - Dividend Comparison
PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than FUL's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.70% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.40% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.77% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
PH vs. FUL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and H.B. Fuller Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PH vs. FUL - Profitability Comparison
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
FUL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 322.24M and revenue of 950.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
FUL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 122.83M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
FUL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 67.81M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PH and FUL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUL has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to PH (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs FUL's -68.25%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PH and FUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer