PH vs. BBWI
PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) and BBWI (Bath & Body Works, Inc.) are both stocks. PH operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while BBWI operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, PH returned 25.12%/yr vs -6.65%/yr for BBWI. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PH vs. BBWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly higher than BBWI's -1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed BBWI with an annualized return of 25.12%, while BBWI has yielded a comparatively lower -6.65% annualized return.
PH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 36.66%
- 3Y*
- 36.33%
- 5Y*
- 26.12%
- 10Y*
- 25.12%
BBWI
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- -1.48%
- 6M
- -1.33%
- 1Y
- -22.74%
- 3Y*
- -19.94%
- 5Y*
- -16.60%
- 10Y*
- -6.65%
PH vs. BBWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 3.21% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc. | -1.48% | -46.52% | -8.26% | 4.68% | -38.40% | 133.77% | 107.78% | -25.18% | -54.31% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PH and BBWI is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.34 |
The correlation between PH and BBWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PH:
$27.11
BBWI:
$4.58
PH:
33.33
BBWI:
4.24
PH:
5.53
BBWI:
0.42
PH:
$20.99B
BBWI:
$7.25B
PH:
$7.81B
BBWI:
$3.13B
PH:
$5.31B
BBWI:
$1.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PH vs. BBWI — Risk / Return Rank
PH
BBWI
PH vs. BBWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PH | BBWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.97 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | -0.41 | +2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | -0.71 | +6.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PH vs. BBWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, smaller than the maximum BBWI drawdown of -88.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and BBWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PH | BBWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.92% | -88.22% | +21.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -55.00% | +35.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.79% | -69.98% | +43.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | -79.16% | +50.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.68% | -85.67% | +30.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.49% | -72.24% | +60.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -30.35% | +15.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.52% | 31.98% | -25.46% |
Volatility
PH vs. BBWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 7.58%, while Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) has a volatility of 18.68%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PH | BBWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 18.68% | -11.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.96% | 39.03% | -20.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.10% | 56.34% | -31.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 50.65% | -21.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.70% | 54.62% | -22.92% |
Dividends
PH vs. BBWI - Dividend Comparison
PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than BBWI's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc. | 4.12% | 3.98% | 2.06% | 1.85% | 1.90% | 22.61% | 0.81% | 6.62% | 9.35% | 3.99% | 6.68% | 4.17% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.82% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
PH vs. BBWI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Bath & Body Works, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PH vs. BBWI - Profitability Comparison
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
BBWI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bath & Body Works, Inc. reported a gross profit of 587.00M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.6%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
BBWI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bath & Body Works, Inc. reported an operating income of 231.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
BBWI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bath & Body Works, Inc. reported a net income of 183.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PH and BBWI have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBWI has higher volatility (18.68%) compared to PH (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs BBWI's -88.22%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PH and BBWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer