PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGX vs. VRP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGX vs. VRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGX achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than VRP's 2.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PGX has underperformed VRP with an annualized return of 2.36%, while VRP has yielded a comparatively higher 5.23% annualized return.


PGX

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
0.04%
1Y
5.73%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
-0.74%
10Y*
2.36%

VRP

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.66%
YTD
2.11%
6M
2.32%
1Y
6.96%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
5.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGX vs. VRP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGX
Invesco Preferred ETF
-0.18%3.48%6.53%9.48%-21.16%3.15%7.09%17.09%-4.01%10.48%
VRP
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
2.11%7.34%11.10%10.35%-9.00%4.20%5.11%18.84%-6.62%9.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PGX and VRP is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014

0.55

The correlation between PGX and VRP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

PGX vs. VRP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PGX
VRP

Financial Services

70.9%
41.3%

Utilities

8.2%
17.0%

Real Estate

6.5%
2.8%

Communication Services

6.5%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
0.7%

Industrials

0.8%
1.4%

Basic Materials

0.1%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.3%

Energy

-

7.5%

Healthcare

-

1.7%

Technology

-

-

Financial Services

PGX
70.9%
VRP
41.3%

Utilities

PGX
8.2%
VRP
17.0%

Real Estate

PGX
6.5%
VRP
2.8%

Communication Services

PGX
6.5%
VRP
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PGX
1.9%
VRP
0.7%

Industrials

PGX
0.8%
VRP
1.4%

Basic Materials

PGX
0.1%
VRP
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

PGX

-

VRP
0.3%

Energy

PGX

-

VRP
7.5%

Healthcare

PGX

-

VRP
1.7%

Technology

PGX

-

VRP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGX vs. VRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGX
PGX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VRP
VRP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGX vs. VRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGXVRPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.53

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

2.42

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

13.02

-10.45

PGX vs. VRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the VRP Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGX and VRP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGXVRPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

2.42

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.67

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.36

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.38

-0.24

Drawdowns

PGX vs. VRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGX drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, which is greater than VRP's maximum drawdown of -46.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGX and VRP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGXVRPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.44%

-46.04%

-20.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.98%

-2.89%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.17%

-4.26%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.67%

-13.76%

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

-46.04%

+11.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

-0.12%

-5.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.13%

-2.31%

-5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

0.54%

+1.69%

Volatility

PGX vs. VRP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX) has a higher volatility of 1.73% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) at 0.66%. This indicates that PGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGXVRPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.73%

0.66%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.12%

2.33%

+1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.11%

2.88%

+3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.11%

6.55%

+4.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.02%

14.53%

-1.51%

PGX vs. VRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VRP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGX vs. VRP - Dividend Comparison

PGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, less than VRP's 6.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGX
Invesco Preferred ETF
6.23%6.03%5.95%6.42%6.29%4.82%4.89%4.85%6.09%5.66%6.02%5.84%
VRP
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
6.30%6.53%5.78%6.61%5.38%4.25%4.17%4.71%5.28%4.69%5.10%5.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGX and VRP have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGX has higher volatility (1.73%) compared to VRP (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGX dropped -66.44% vs VRP's -46.04%.

On 10-year performance, VRP leads with 5.23% vs 2.36% for PGX. On fees, VRP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, VRP has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VRP has performed better with a 5.23% return vs 2.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VRP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for PGX.

VRP has the higher dividend yield at 6.30%, compared with 6.23% for PGX.

PGX tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Core Fixed Rate Preferred Securities Index, while VRP tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities Floating and Variable Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for PGX and 0.50% for VRP.

VRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGX and VRP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer