PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGX vs. PFFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGX vs. PFFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX) and Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGX achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than PFFV's 2.93% return.


PGX

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
0.04%
1Y
5.73%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
-0.74%
10Y*
2.36%

PFFV

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.45%
YTD
2.93%
6M
2.88%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
2.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGX vs. PFFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PGX
Invesco Preferred ETF
-0.18%3.48%6.53%9.48%-21.16%3.15%10.27%
PFFV
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
2.93%2.08%9.45%10.64%-13.81%6.35%13.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PGX and PFFV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020

0.79

The correlation between PGX and PFFV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PGX vs. PFFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PGX
PFFV

Financial Services

70.9%
72.1%

Utilities

8.2%

-

Real Estate

6.5%
19.6%

Communication Services

6.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%

-

Industrials

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

0.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

-

Financial Services

PGX
70.9%
PFFV
72.1%

Utilities

PGX
8.2%
PFFV

-

Real Estate

PGX
6.5%
PFFV
19.6%

Communication Services

PGX
6.5%
PFFV

-

Consumer Cyclical

PGX
1.9%
PFFV

-

Industrials

PGX
0.8%
PFFV

-

Basic Materials

PGX
0.1%
PFFV

-

Consumer Defensive

PGX

-

PFFV

-

Energy

PGX

-

PFFV
1.6%

Healthcare

PGX

-

PFFV

-

Technology

PGX

-

PFFV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGX vs. PFFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGX
PGX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFV
PFFV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PFFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFV Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGX vs. PFFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX) and Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGXPFFVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.23

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

1.61

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

4.52

-1.94

PGX vs. PFFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the PFFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGX and PFFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGXPFFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.27

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.26

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.56

-0.41

Drawdowns

PGX vs. PFFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGX drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, which is greater than PFFV's maximum drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGX and PFFV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGXPFFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.44%

-18.96%

-47.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.98%

-3.23%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.17%

-6.07%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.67%

-18.96%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

-0.31%

-4.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.13%

-4.18%

-3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

1.15%

+1.08%

Volatility

PGX vs. PFFV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX) has a higher volatility of 1.73% compared to Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) at 0.79%. This indicates that PGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGXPFFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.73%

0.79%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.12%

2.84%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.11%

4.12%

+1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.11%

8.84%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.02%

8.69%

+4.33%

PGX vs. PFFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGX vs. PFFV - Dividend Comparison

PGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, less than PFFV's 8.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFFV
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
8.12%8.26%7.33%7.17%6.60%5.23%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PGX
Invesco Preferred ETF
6.23%6.03%5.95%6.42%6.29%4.82%4.89%4.85%6.09%5.66%6.02%5.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGX and PFFV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGX has higher volatility (1.73%) compared to PFFV (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGX dropped -66.44% vs PFFV's -18.96%.

On 5-year performance, PFFV leads with 2.24% vs -0.74% for PGX. On fees, PFFV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PFFV has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFFV has performed better with a 2.24% return vs -0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFFV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for PGX.

PFFV has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 6.23% for PGX.

PGX tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Core Fixed Rate Preferred Securities Index, while PFFV tracks ICE U.S. Variable Rate Preferred Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for PGX and 0.25% for PFFV.

PFFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGX and PFFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer