PGX vs. PFFV
PGX (Invesco Preferred ETF) and PFFV (Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - PGX tracks the BofA Merrill Lynch Core Fixed Rate Preferred Securities Index while PFFV tracks the ICE U.S. Variable Rate Preferred Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PGX returned -0.74%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for PFFV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PGX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PFFV.
Performance
PGX vs. PFFV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGX achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than PFFV's 2.93% return.
PGX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 5.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.24%
- 5Y*
- -0.74%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
PFFV
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- —
PGX vs. PFFV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGX Invesco Preferred ETF | -0.18% | 3.48% | 6.53% | 9.48% | -21.16% | 3.15% | 10.27% |
PFFV Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 2.93% | 2.08% | 9.45% | 10.64% | -13.81% | 6.35% | 13.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGX and PFFV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.79 |
The correlation between PGX and PFFV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PGX vs. PFFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PGX
PFFV
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Financial Services
PGX
PFFV
Utilities
PGX
PFFV
-
Real Estate
PGX
PFFV
Communication Services
PGX
PFFV
-
Consumer Cyclical
PGX
PFFV
-
Industrials
PGX
PFFV
-
Basic Materials
PGX
PFFV
-
Consumer Defensive
PGX
-
PFFV
-
Energy
PGX
-
PFFV
Healthcare
PGX
-
PFFV
-
Technology
PGX
-
PFFV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGX vs. PFFV — Risk / Return Rank
PGX
PFFV
PGX vs. PFFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX) and Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGX | PFFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 1.61 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 4.52 | -1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGX | PFFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.27 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.26 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.56 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
PGX vs. PFFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGX drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, which is greater than PFFV's maximum drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGX and PFFV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGX | PFFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.44% | -18.96% | -47.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.98% | -3.23% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.17% | -6.07% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.67% | -18.96% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -0.31% | -4.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.13% | -4.18% | -3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 1.15% | +1.08% |
Volatility
PGX vs. PFFV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX) has a higher volatility of 1.73% compared to Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) at 0.79%. This indicates that PGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGX | PFFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | 0.79% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.12% | 2.84% | +1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.11% | 4.12% | +1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 8.84% | +2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.02% | 8.69% | +4.33% |
PGX vs. PFFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGX vs. PFFV - Dividend Comparison
PGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, less than PFFV's 8.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFV Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 8.12% | 8.26% | 7.33% | 7.17% | 6.60% | 5.23% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGX Invesco Preferred ETF | 6.23% | 6.03% | 5.95% | 6.42% | 6.29% | 4.82% | 4.89% | 4.85% | 6.09% | 5.66% | 6.02% | 5.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGX and PFFV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGX has higher volatility (1.73%) compared to PFFV (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGX dropped -66.44% vs PFFV's -18.96%.
On 5-year performance, PFFV leads with 2.24% vs -0.74% for PGX. On fees, PFFV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PFFV has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PFFV has performed better with a 2.24% return vs -0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for PGX.
PFFV has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 6.23% for PGX.
PGX tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Core Fixed Rate Preferred Securities Index, while PFFV tracks ICE U.S. Variable Rate Preferred Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for PGX and 0.25% for PFFV.
PFFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGX and PFFV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer