PGX vs. ICVT
PGX (Invesco Preferred ETF) and ICVT (iShares Convertible Bond ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - PGX tracks the BofA Merrill Lynch Core Fixed Rate Preferred Securities Index while ICVT tracks the Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PGX returned 2.36%/yr vs 13.99%/yr for ICVT. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PGX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ICVT.
Performance
PGX vs. ICVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGX achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than ICVT's 25.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PGX has underperformed ICVT with an annualized return of 2.36%, while ICVT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.
PGX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 5.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.24%
- 5Y*
- -0.74%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
ICVT
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 7.16%
- YTD
- 25.28%
- 6M
- 24.31%
- 1Y
- 42.20%
- 3Y*
- 21.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
PGX vs. ICVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGX Invesco Preferred ETF | -0.18% | 3.48% | 6.53% | 9.48% | -21.16% | 3.15% | 7.09% | 17.09% | -4.01% | 10.48% |
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 25.28% | 18.10% | 10.61% | 15.35% | -20.66% | -0.66% | 61.01% | 21.76% | -0.27% | 16.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGX and ICVT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2015 | 0.40 |
PGX vs. ICVT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PGX
ICVT
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
PGX
ICVT
-
Utilities
PGX
ICVT
-
Real Estate
PGX
ICVT
-
Communication Services
PGX
ICVT
-
Consumer Cyclical
PGX
ICVT
Industrials
PGX
ICVT
-
Basic Materials
PGX
ICVT
-
Consumer Defensive
PGX
-
ICVT
-
Energy
PGX
-
ICVT
-
Healthcare
PGX
-
ICVT
Technology
PGX
-
ICVT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGX vs. ICVT — Risk / Return Rank
PGX
ICVT
PGX vs. ICVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.52 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 5.62 | -4.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 20.48 | -17.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.95 | -2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.59 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.91 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.78 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
PGX vs. ICVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGX drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, which is greater than ICVT's maximum drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGX and ICVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.44% | -33.25% | -33.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.98% | -7.55% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.17% | -11.22% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.67% | -29.95% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.10% | -33.25% | -0.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -0.97% | -4.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.13% | -9.50% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 2.07% | +0.16% |
Volatility
PGX vs. ICVT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX) is 1.73%, while iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that PGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | 5.53% | -3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.12% | 11.69% | -7.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.11% | 14.36% | -8.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 13.23% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.02% | 15.50% | -2.48% |
PGX vs. ICVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ICVT's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGX vs. ICVT - Dividend Comparison
PGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, more than ICVT's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 1.30% | 1.73% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.93% | 7.70% | 3.98% | 1.86% | 4.82% | 2.56% | 3.06% | 1.57% |
PGX Invesco Preferred ETF | 6.23% | 6.03% | 5.95% | 6.42% | 6.29% | 4.82% | 4.89% | 4.85% | 6.09% | 5.66% | 6.02% | 5.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGX and ICVT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICVT has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to PGX (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGX dropped -66.44% vs ICVT's -33.25%.
On 10-year performance, ICVT leads with 13.99% vs 2.36% for PGX. On fees, ICVT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, PGX has been the lower-risk option at 1.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ICVT has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 2.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICVT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for PGX.
PGX has the higher dividend yield at 6.23%, compared with 1.30% for ICVT.
PGX tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Core Fixed Rate Preferred Securities Index, while ICVT tracks Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for PGX and 0.20% for ICVT.
ICVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGX and ICVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer