PGVFX vs. GMGEX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PGVFX (Polaris Global Value Fund) and GMGEX (GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PGVFX returned 10.87%/yr vs 11.28%/yr for GMGEX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PGVFX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for GMGEX.

Performance

PGVFX vs. GMGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) and GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PGVFX having a 19.53% return and GMGEX slightly lower at 19.27%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PGVFX having a 10.87% annualized return and GMGEX not far ahead at 11.28%.

PGVFX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 4.38%
• YTD: 19.53%
• 6M: 22.73%
• 1Y: 38.21%
• 3Y*: 21.58%
• 5Y*: 9.45%
• 10Y*: 10.87%

GMGEX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 4.86%
• YTD: 19.27%
• 6M: 21.08%
• 1Y: 41.55%
• 3Y*: 21.78%
• 5Y*: 9.85%
• 10Y*: 11.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGVFX vs. GMGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund	19.53%	27.01%	5.33%	14.76%	-12.00%	15.38%	6.65%	22.83%	-12.64%	20.60%
GMGEX GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund	19.27%	29.14%	4.12%	22.27%	-17.07%	14.99%	9.55%	25.45%	-13.04%	26.39%

Correlation

The correlation between PGVFX and GMGEX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 1998	0.83

The correlation between PGVFX and GMGEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PGVFX vs. GMGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGVFX

PGVFX Risk / Return Rank: 90
PGVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PGVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PGVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PGVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PGVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

GMGEX

GMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 90
GMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
GMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
GMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGVFX vs. GMGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) and GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PGVFX	GMGEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.32	3.31	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.65	4.53	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.60	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.45	4.54	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.11	18.01	-1.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PGVFX vs. GMGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGVFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is comparable to the GMGEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGVFX and GMGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PGVFX	GMGEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.32	3.31	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.67	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.70	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.25	+0.24

Drawdowns

PGVFX vs. GMGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGVFX drawdown since its inception was -68.09%, which is greater than GMGEX's maximum drawdown of -58.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGVFX and GMGEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGVFX	GMGEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.09%	-58.47%	-9.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.76%	-9.24%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.53%	-17.12%	+4.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.58%	-28.58%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.26%	-34.98%	-6.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-0.48%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.30%	-16.75%	+5.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	2.32%	+0.10%

Volatility

PGVFX vs. GMGEX - Volatility Comparison

Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) and GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) have volatilities of 4.09% and 4.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGVFX	GMGEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	4.01%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.55%	9.91%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.76%	12.66%	-0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.80%	14.81%	-1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.87%	16.06%	-0.19%

PGVFX vs. GMGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGVFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GMGEX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

PGVFX vs. GMGEX - Dividend Comparison

PGVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than GMGEX's 3.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GMGEX GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund	3.93%	4.69%	0.29%	5.62%	7.81%	7.76%	3.83%	3.14%	3.14%	2.90%	3.71%	4.20%
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund	4.33%	5.17%	5.65%	1.68%	3.55%	4.05%	1.55%	3.69%	3.39%	1.50%	1.32%	1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PGVFX and GMGEX in my portfolio?

PGVFX and GMGEX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PGVFX or GMGEX?

PGVFX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to GMGEX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGVFX dropped -68.09% vs GMGEX's -58.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 3.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.