PGTQX vs. PDBZX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX).
PGTQX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Feb 3, 2012. PDBZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 14, 1997.
Performance
PGTQX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PGTQX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGTQX PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 | -1.60% | 11.14% | 0.31% | 8.46% | -22.33% | -5.95% | 10.07% | 15.22% | -1.59% | 13.59% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | -0.28% | 7.70% | 2.87% | 7.70% | -14.33% | -1.46% | 8.01% | 14.76% | -0.72% | 6.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGTQX achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than PDBZX's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PGTQX has underperformed PDBZX with an annualized return of 1.82%, while PDBZX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.95% annualized return.
PGTQX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- -1.60%
- 6M
- -1.16%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- -1.40%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
PDBZX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGTQX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGTQX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PGTQX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank
PGTQX
PDBZX
PGTQX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGTQX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 0.99 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 1.41 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 1.63 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.40 | 4.74 | +0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGTQX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 0.99 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.16 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | 0.55 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 1.09 | -0.98 |
Correlation
The correlation between PGTQX and PDBZX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PGTQX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison
PGTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than PDBZX's 4.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGTQX PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 | 3.70% | 4.00% | 4.47% | 2.96% | 3.53% | 3.36% | 3.94% | 8.65% | 3.63% | 3.41% | 4.02% | 3.85% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | 4.18% | 4.54% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.73% | 2.73% | 2.94% | 10.36% | 4.01% | 2.87% | 3.92% | 3.33% |
Drawdowns
PGTQX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGTQX drawdown since its inception was -44.72%, which is greater than PDBZX's maximum drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTQX and PDBZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGTQX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.72% | -20.88% | -23.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.55% | -3.06% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.46% | -20.81% | -10.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.72% | -20.88% | -23.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.24% | -2.27% | -25.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.09% | -2.31% | -17.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 1.06% | +0.06% |
Volatility
PGTQX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) has a higher volatility of 2.22% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) at 1.71%. This indicates that PGTQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PGTQX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.22% | 1.71% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.31% | 2.71% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.24% | 4.59% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.50% | 6.00% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 5.34% | +16.17% |