PGTAX vs. RTEC.NEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PGTAX (Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A) and RTEC.NEO (RBC Global Technology Fund ETF Series) are both Technology Equities funds. PGTAX is passively managed, while RTEC.NEO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PGTAX returned 37.35%/yr vs 34.88%/yr for RTEC.NEO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PGTAX charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for RTEC.NEO.

Performance

PGTAX vs. RTEC.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) and RBC Global Technology Fund ETF Series (RTEC.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PGTAX is traded in USD, while RTEC.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the RTEC.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGTAX achieves a 44.13% return, which is significantly higher than RTEC.NEO's 18.31% return.

PGTAX

• 1D: 2.20%
• 1M: 23.82%
• YTD: 44.13%
• 6M: 43.30%
• 1Y: 76.11%
• 3Y*: 37.35%
• 5Y*: 20.14%
• 10Y*: 25.90%

RTEC.NEO

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: 11.18%
• YTD: 18.31%
• 6M: 18.29%
• 1Y: 43.00%
• 3Y*: 34.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGTAX vs. RTEC.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PGTAX Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A	44.13%	23.03%	27.57%	32.60%
RTEC.NEO RBC Global Technology Fund ETF Series	18.31%	22.80%	31.77%	41.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PGTAX and RTEC.NEO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023	0.63

The correlation between PGTAX and RTEC.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PGTAX vs. RTEC.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGTAX

PGTAX Risk / Return Rank: 90
PGTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PGTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PGTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PGTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PGTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

RTEC.NEO

RTEC.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 62
RTEC.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
RTEC.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RTEC.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
RTEC.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
RTEC.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGTAX vs. RTEC.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) and RBC Global Technology Fund ETF Series (RTEC.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PGTAX	RTEC.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.55	2.35	+1.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.19	3.15	+1.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.44	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.74	2.66	+3.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.29	9.30	+9.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PGTAX vs. RTEC.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGTAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.55, which is higher than the RTEC.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGTAX and RTEC.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PGTAX	RTEC.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.55	2.35	+1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	1.57	-0.62

Drawdowns

PGTAX vs. RTEC.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGTAX drawdown since its inception was -42.21%, which is greater than RTEC.NEO's maximum drawdown of -25.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTAX and RTEC.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGTAX	RTEC.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.21%	-25.17%	-17.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.67%	-16.24%	+2.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.42%	-25.17%	-3.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.94%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.67%	-3.46%	-3.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.28%	4.64%	-0.36%

Volatility

PGTAX vs. RTEC.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to RBC Global Technology Fund ETF Series (RTEC.NEO) at 4.74%. This indicates that PGTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTEC.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGTAX	RTEC.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.69%	4.74%	+2.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.73%	14.79%	+2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.07%	18.41%	+3.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.98%	22.93%	+2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.11%	22.93%	+1.18%

PGTAX vs. RTEC.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGTAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than RTEC.NEO's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

PGTAX vs. RTEC.NEO - Dividend Comparison

PGTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, while RTEC.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PGTAX Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A	7.95%	11.45%	6.71%	0.38%	1.52%	22.04%	14.04%	2.49%	9.37%	6.91%	0.83%	4.64%
RTEC.NEO RBC Global Technology Fund ETF Series	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PGTAX and RTEC.NEO in my portfolio?

PGTAX and RTEC.NEO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.