PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGOYX vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGOYX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Large Cap Growth Y (PGOYX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PGOYX having a 9.63% return and VUG slightly lower at 9.49%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PGOYX having a 18.83% annualized return and VUG not far behind at 18.26%.


PGOYX

1D
-0.12%
1M
7.19%
YTD
9.63%
6M
9.26%
1Y
26.15%
3Y*
24.50%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
18.83%

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGOYX vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGOYX
Putnam Large Cap Growth Y
9.63%14.56%33.58%44.57%-30.25%22.95%38.79%36.76%2.58%31.29%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PGOYX and VUG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.97

The correlation between PGOYX and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGOYX vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGOYX
PGOYX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PGOYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGOYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGOYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PGOYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGOYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGOYX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Large Cap Growth Y (PGOYX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGOYXVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.69

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.51

5.92

-0.41

PGOYX vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGOYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGOYX and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGOYXVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.77

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.68

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.85

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.62

-0.26

Drawdowns

PGOYX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGOYX drawdown since its inception was -76.03%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGOYX and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGOYXVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.03%

-50.68%

-25.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.34%

-16.53%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.63%

-22.85%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.01%

-35.61%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

-35.61%

+1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-1.51%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.53%

-7.09%

-24.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

4.71%

+0.17%

Volatility

PGOYX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Large Cap Growth Y (PGOYX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGOYXVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.83%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.08%

12.11%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

15.84%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

22.22%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.21%

21.44%

-0.23%

PGOYX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGOYX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGOYX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

PGOYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGOYX
Putnam Large Cap Growth Y
4.77%5.23%4.25%0.46%7.30%8.55%3.12%3.65%7.92%2.05%0.02%5.78%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PGOYX and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VUG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to PGOYX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGOYX dropped -76.03% vs VUG's -50.68%.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGOYX and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer