PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGROX vs. PRAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGROX vs. PRAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX) and T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGROX achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly lower than PRAFX's 15.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PGROX has outperformed PRAFX with an annualized return of 12.19%, while PRAFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.05% annualized return.


PGROX

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.75%
YTD
4.06%
6M
3.74%
1Y
14.18%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
12.19%

PRAFX

1D
1.45%
1M
1.70%
YTD
15.05%
6M
17.16%
1Y
38.09%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
9.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGROX vs. PRAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGROX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund
4.06%13.46%7.88%22.40%-17.75%23.85%24.43%34.92%-8.66%27.05%
PRAFX
T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund
15.05%29.51%0.32%6.65%-10.24%25.74%7.02%19.62%-11.55%10.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PGROX and PRAFX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2010

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between PGROX and PRAFX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGROX vs. PRAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGROX
PGROX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAFX
PRAFX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PRAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGROX vs. PRAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX) and T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGROXPRAFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.42

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

2.96

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.87

10.93

-6.06

PGROX vs. PRAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGROX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the PRAFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGROX and PRAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGROXPRAFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

2.37

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.47

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.50

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.36

+0.19

Drawdowns

PGROX vs. PRAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGROX drawdown since its inception was -47.75%, which is greater than PRAFX's maximum drawdown of -38.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGROX and PRAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGROXPRAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.75%

-38.05%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.70%

-12.91%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.81%

-16.86%

-6.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.99%

-26.73%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.17%

-38.05%

+7.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-3.83%

+3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-8.77%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.48%

-0.51%

Volatility

PGROX vs. PRAFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX) is 3.15%, while T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that PGROX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGROXPRAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

4.87%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

13.29%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

16.19%

-3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

17.70%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

18.14%

-0.18%

PGROX vs. PRAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGROX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAFX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGROX vs. PRAFX - Dividend Comparison

PGROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.05%, more than PRAFX's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGROX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund
17.05%17.72%11.89%1.88%7.61%8.12%4.05%7.44%13.96%13.45%8.19%8.46%
PRAFX
T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund
2.56%2.94%1.56%1.52%1.38%1.83%1.37%2.64%2.58%1.45%1.96%1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGROX and PRAFX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRAFX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to PGROX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGROX dropped -47.75% vs PRAFX's -38.05%.

PRAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGROX and PRAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer