PGRI vs. PEMX
PGRI (Putnam International Stock ETF) and PEMX (Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PGRI is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Putnam, while PEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Putnam. Both are actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PGRI charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PEMX.
Performance
PGRI vs. PEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGRI achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than PEMX's 35.84% return.
PGRI
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEMX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 30.19%
- YTD
- 35.84%
- 1Y
- 56.83%
- 3Y*
- 32.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PGRI vs. PEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PGRI Putnam International Stock ETF | 8.61% | -1.11% |
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 35.84% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGRI and PEMX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGRI vs. PEMX — Risk / Return Rank
PGRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PEMX
PGRI vs. PEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam International Stock ETF (PGRI) and Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PGRI | PEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PGRI vs. PEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGRI drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, smaller than the maximum PEMX drawdown of -14.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGRI and PEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGRI | PEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.87% | -14.91% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -8.13% | +4.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -2.90% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.06% | — |
Volatility
PGRI vs. PEMX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGRI | PEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.77% | 25.62% | -4.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 19.72% | +1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 19.72% | +1.05% |
PGRI vs. PEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGRI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PEMX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGRI vs. PEMX - Dividend Comparison
PGRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than PEMX's 5.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 5.15% | 7.00% | 5.00% | 0.72% |
PGRI Putnam International Stock ETF | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGRI and PEMX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PGRI is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PGRI is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEMX.
PEMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 0.11% for PGRI.
PGRI is categorized as Actively Managed, while PEMX is Emerging Markets Diversified. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PGRI and 0.85% for PEMX.
Find the right allocation for PGRI and PEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer