PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGR vs. LIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PGR vs. LIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Linde plc (LIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGR achieves a -6.42% return, which is significantly lower than LIN's 18.48% return.


PGR

1D
-1.84%
1M
3.23%
YTD
-6.42%
6M
-4.51%
1Y
-23.65%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
23.25%

LIN

1D
-1.18%
1M
2.10%
YTD
18.48%
6M
29.74%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGR vs. LIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
-6.42%-3.02%51.39%23.16%26.81%10.84%41.48%25.14%-14.67%
LIN
Linde plc
18.48%3.22%3.18%27.66%-4.39%33.39%25.88%39.04%-7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PGR and LIN is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018

0.37

The correlation between PGR and LIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PGR:

$19.23

LIN:

$15.16

PE Ratio

PGR:

10.41

LIN:

33.11

PEG Ratio

PGR:

0.08

LIN:

1.65

PS Ratio

PGR:

1.34

LIN:

6.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

PGR:

$87.65B

LIN:

$34.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PGR:

$23.23B

LIN:

$15.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

PGR:

$14.81B

LIN:

$12.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGR vs. LIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGR
PGR Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGR Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

LIN
LIN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIN Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGR vs. LIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Linde plc (LIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGRLINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.09

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

0.40

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

1.12

-2.55

PGR vs. LIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGR Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the LIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGR and LIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGRLINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.04

0.45

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.63

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.71

-0.13

Drawdowns

PGR vs. LIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGR drawdown since its inception was -71.06%, which is greater than LIN's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGR and LIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGRLINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.06%

-32.59%

-38.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.27%

-19.18%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.35%

-19.18%

-11.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.35%

-22.82%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.74%

-2.72%

-24.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-5.43%

-9.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.79%

6.80%

+11.99%

Volatility

PGR vs. LIN - Volatility Comparison

The Progressive Corporation (PGR) has a higher volatility of 7.57% compared to Linde plc (LIN) at 5.16%. This indicates that PGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGRLINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

5.16%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.95%

13.47%

+3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.76%

16.98%

+5.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.55%

20.74%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.48%

24.07%

+0.41%

Dividends

PGR vs. LIN - Dividend Comparison

PGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than LIN's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIN
Linde plc
1.24%1.41%1.33%1.24%1.43%1.22%1.46%1.64%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
6.94%2.15%0.48%0.25%0.31%6.23%2.68%3.89%1.86%1.21%2.50%2.16%

Financials

PGR vs. LIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Progressive Corporation and Linde plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
22.74B
8.78B
(PGR) Total Revenue
(LIN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PGR vs. LIN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Progressive Corporation and Linde plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
29.3%
48.5%
Portfolio components
PGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.66B and revenue of 22.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.3%.

LIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported a gross profit of 4.26B and revenue of 8.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.

PGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported an operating income of 3.68B and revenue of 22.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

LIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported an operating income of 3.26B and revenue of 8.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.

PGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported a net income of 2.95B and revenue of 22.74B, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.

LIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported a net income of 1.86B and revenue of 8.78B, resulting in a net margin of 21.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PGR and LIN have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGR has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to LIN (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGR dropped -71.06% vs LIN's -32.59%.

LIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGR and LIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer