PGR vs. CHPS
PGR (The Progressive Corporation) is a stock, while CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Over the past year, PGR returned -26.26% vs 211.40% for CHPS. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
PGR vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGR achieves a -8.70% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 103.69% return.
PGR
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- -8.70%
- 6M
- -8.45%
- 1Y
- -26.26%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- 22.91%
CHPS
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- 23.46%
- YTD
- 103.69%
- 6M
- 107.58%
- 1Y
- 211.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PGR vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PGR The Progressive Corporation | -8.70% | -3.02% | 51.39% | 38.87% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 103.69% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGR and CHPS is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | -0.16 |
The correlation between PGR and CHPS shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to -0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGR vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
PGR
CHPS
PGR vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGR | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.78 | -0.96 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 12.16 | -13.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 47.22 | -48.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGR | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.19 | 6.17 | -7.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.77 | -1.19 |
Drawdowns
PGR vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGR drawdown since its inception was -71.06%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGR and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGR | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.06% | -39.44% | -31.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.64% | -17.50% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.53% | -2.06% | -26.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.53% | -9.15% | -5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.45% | 4.50% | +14.95% |
Volatility
PGR vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is 5.89%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.07%. This indicates that PGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGR | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 14.07% | -8.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.28% | 28.29% | -12.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.26% | 34.50% | -12.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.52% | 33.78% | -9.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.43% | 33.78% | -9.35% |
Dividends
PGR vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
PGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, more than CHPS's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.33% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGR The Progressive Corporation | 7.11% | 2.15% | 0.48% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 6.23% | 2.68% | 3.89% | 1.86% | 1.21% | 2.50% | 2.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGR and CHPS have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to PGR (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGR dropped -71.06% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.17 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGR and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer