PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGNAX vs. SBMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGNAX vs. SBMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund (SBMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, PGNAX has outperformed SBMBX with an annualized return of 9.94%, while SBMBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.


PGNAX

1D
1.44%
1M
-5.19%
6M
4.06%
YTD
13.74%
1Y
42.11%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
15.95%
10Y*
9.94%

SBMBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
1.70%
3Y*
1.83%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGNAX vs. SBMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGNAX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund
13.74%38.58%0.80%-2.22%24.40%27.22%11.22%16.50%-27.87%4.99%
SBMBX
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund
0.00%5.05%-7.25%6.28%19.60%25.58%-19.21%-0.96%-18.00%8.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PGNAX and SBMBX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between PGNAX and SBMBX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGNAX vs. SBMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGNAX
PGNAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PGNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PGNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SBMBX
SBMBX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
SBMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
SBMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGNAX vs. SBMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund (SBMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGNAXSBMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.03

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

0.12

+3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

0.23

+9.43

PGNAX vs. SBMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the SBMBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGNAX and SBMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGNAX vs. SBMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGNAX drawdown since its inception was -76.46%, roughly equal to the maximum SBMBX drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGNAX and SBMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGNAXSBMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.46%

-74.35%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-5.66%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.21%

-25.34%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-26.66%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.86%

-65.48%

+1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.05%

-31.22%

+21.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.19%

-28.69%

+8.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

2.82%

+1.42%

Volatility

PGNAX vs. SBMBX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund (SBMBX) at 0.00%. This indicates that PGNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGNAXSBMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

0.00%

+5.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.94%

2.01%

+15.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.09%

9.77%

+12.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.36%

20.52%

+4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.41%

23.93%

+2.48%

PGNAX vs. SBMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGNAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than SBMBX's 3.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGNAX vs. SBMBX - Dividend Comparison

PGNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than SBMBX's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PGNAX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund
0.84%0.96%0.98%1.93%2.75%0.84%1.32%1.78%1.59%0.00%1.15%
SBMBX
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Fund
2.13%2.13%2.17%0.00%2.75%0.75%1.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGNAX and SBMBX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGNAX has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to SBMBX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGNAX dropped -76.46% vs SBMBX's -74.35%.

PGNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGNAX and SBMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer