PGIIX vs. SGSCX
PGIIX (Polen Global Growth Fund) and SGSCX (DWS Global Small Cap Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PGIIX returned 10.50%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for SGSCX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PGIIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for SGSCX.
Performance
PGIIX vs. SGSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGIIX achieves a -6.66% return, which is significantly lower than SGSCX's 21.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PGIIX has outperformed SGSCX with an annualized return of 10.50%, while SGSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.72% annualized return.
PGIIX
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- -6.66%
- 6M
- -6.95%
- 1Y
- -4.41%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
SGSCX
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 21.52%
- 6M
- 19.63%
- 1Y
- 42.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.60%
- 10Y*
- 8.72%
PGIIX vs. SGSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGIIX Polen Global Growth Fund | -6.66% | 1.91% | 16.43% | 31.09% | -31.20% | 17.43% | 23.67% | 35.47% | 2.48% | 31.52% |
SGSCX DWS Global Small Cap Fund | 21.52% | 20.22% | 5.35% | 24.62% | -24.63% | 15.10% | 16.98% | 22.29% | -21.96% | 19.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGIIX and SGSCX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2014 | 0.72 |
The correlation between PGIIX and SGSCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGIIX vs. SGSCX — Risk / Return Rank
PGIIX
SGSCX
PGIIX vs. SGSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Global Growth Fund (PGIIX) and DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PGIIX | SGSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.46 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 4.54 | -4.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 16.95 | -17.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PGIIX vs. SGSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGIIX drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, smaller than the maximum SGSCX drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGIIX and SGSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGIIX | SGSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.09% | -62.26% | +25.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.38% | -9.54% | -12.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.38% | -22.37% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.09% | -33.72% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.09% | -45.98% | +8.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.70% | -0.25% | -11.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -14.10% | +7.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.24% | 2.54% | +6.70% |
Volatility
PGIIX vs. SGSCX - Volatility Comparison
Polen Global Growth Fund (PGIIX) and DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX) have volatilities of 6.06% and 5.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGIIX | SGSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 5.95% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.23% | 12.36% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 15.94% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.70% | 18.97% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 19.56% | -0.26% |
PGIIX vs. SGSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGIIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SGSCX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGIIX vs. SGSCX - Dividend Comparison
PGIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.16%, more than SGSCX's 8.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGIIX Polen Global Growth Fund | 23.16% | 21.62% | 7.45% | 0.00% | 1.15% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.09% |
SGSCX DWS Global Small Cap Fund | 8.53% | 10.37% | 6.35% | 5.12% | 5.42% | 16.72% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 18.31% | 11.13% | 7.52% | 6.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGIIX and SGSCX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGIIX has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to SGSCX (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGIIX dropped -37.09% vs SGSCX's -62.26%.
SGSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGIIX and SGSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer