PGHY vs. JSMD
PGHY (Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF) and JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PGHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index, while JSMD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PGHY returned 4.32%/yr vs 13.27%/yr for JSMD. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PGHY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JSMD.
Performance
PGHY vs. JSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGHY achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly lower than JSMD's 15.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PGHY has underperformed JSMD with an annualized return of 4.32%, while JSMD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.27% annualized return.
PGHY
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 7.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
JSMD
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 15.35%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 23.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.18%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.27%
PGHY vs. JSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 2.18% | 8.88% | 8.39% | 10.15% | -5.50% | 1.22% | 3.04% | 5.87% | 0.38% | 2.97% |
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 15.35% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -22.84% | 8.40% | 30.79% | 31.05% | -4.73% | 24.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGHY and JSMD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2016 | 0.30 |
PGHY vs. JSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PGHY
JSMD
Financial Services
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
PGHY
JSMD
Communication Services
PGHY
JSMD
Basic Materials
PGHY
JSMD
Consumer Cyclical
PGHY
JSMD
Energy
PGHY
JSMD
Industrials
PGHY
JSMD
Healthcare
PGHY
JSMD
Utilities
PGHY
JSMD
-
Consumer Defensive
PGHY
JSMD
Technology
PGHY
JSMD
Real Estate
PGHY
JSMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGHY vs. JSMD — Risk / Return Rank
PGHY
JSMD
PGHY vs. JSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGHY | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.20 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 1.60 | +0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | 5.38 | +4.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGHY | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.07 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.32 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.58 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.63 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
PGHY vs. JSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGHY drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum JSMD drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGHY and JSMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGHY | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -38.98% | +18.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -14.86% | +11.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.03% | -24.01% | +18.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.42% | -32.18% | +22.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.50% | -38.98% | +18.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -3.42% | +2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -7.48% | +5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 4.41% | -3.62% |
Volatility
PGHY vs. JSMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) is 2.00%, while Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a volatility of 7.33%. This indicates that PGHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGHY | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 7.33% | -5.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.73% | 16.77% | -13.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.06% | 22.16% | -17.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 22.92% | -17.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 22.80% | -15.76% |
PGHY vs. JSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGHY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JSMD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGHY vs. JSMD - Dividend Comparison
PGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, more than JSMD's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.48% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.00% |
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.11% | 7.24% | 7.49% | 7.87% | 5.12% | 5.17% | 5.45% | 5.32% | 5.45% | 5.52% | 6.26% | 4.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGHY and JSMD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSMD has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to PGHY (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGHY dropped -20.50% vs JSMD's -38.98%.
On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 13.27% vs 4.32% for PGHY. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PGHY has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 13.27% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PGHY.
PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.11%, compared with 0.48% for JSMD.
PGHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while JSMD is Mid Cap Growth Equities. PGHY tracks DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index, while JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PGHY and 0.30% for JSMD.
PGHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGHY and JSMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer