PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGHY vs. ESHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGHY vs. ESHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PGHY

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.76%
YTD
2.49%
6M
2.62%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
4.43%

ESHY

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGHY vs. ESHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


PGHY vs. ESHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PGHY
ESHY

Financial Services

8.8%

-

Communication Services

6.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%

-

Basic Materials

5.6%

-

Energy

3.6%
100.0%

Industrials

3.5%

-

Healthcare

2.5%

-

Technology

1.7%

-

Utilities

1.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.4%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Financial Services

PGHY
8.8%
ESHY

-

Communication Services

PGHY
6.2%
ESHY

-

Consumer Cyclical

PGHY
5.7%
ESHY

-

Basic Materials

PGHY
5.6%
ESHY

-

Energy

PGHY
3.6%
ESHY
100.0%

Industrials

PGHY
3.5%
ESHY

-

Healthcare

PGHY
2.5%
ESHY

-

Technology

PGHY
1.7%
ESHY

-

Utilities

PGHY
1.5%
ESHY

-

Consumer Defensive

PGHY
1.4%
ESHY

-

Real Estate

PGHY
0.5%
ESHY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGHY vs. ESHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGHY
PGHY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PGHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGHY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PGHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGHY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ESHY
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGHY vs. ESHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGHYESHYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.32

PGHY vs. ESHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGHYESHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

Drawdowns

PGHY vs. ESHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGHY drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, which is greater than ESHY's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGHY and ESHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGHYESHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

0.00%

-20.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

0.00%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

0.00%

-1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

Volatility

PGHY vs. ESHY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGHYESHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.01%

0.00%

+5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.44%

0.00%

+5.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.04%

0.00%

+7.04%

PGHY vs. ESHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGHY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ESHY's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGHY vs. ESHY - Dividend Comparison

PGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, while ESHY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESHY
Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PGHY
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
7.09%7.24%7.49%7.87%5.12%5.17%5.45%5.32%5.45%5.52%6.26%4.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, ESHY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESHY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PGHY.

PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.09%, compared with 0.00% for ESHY.

PGHY tracks DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index, while ESHY tracks JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PGHY and 0.20% for ESHY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGHY and ESHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer