PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGHY vs. BBHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGHY vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGHY achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than BBHY's 1.58% return.


PGHY

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.76%
YTD
2.49%
6M
2.62%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
4.43%

BBHY

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.96%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
8.61%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGHY vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGHY
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
2.49%8.88%8.39%10.15%-5.50%1.22%3.04%5.87%0.38%2.97%
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.58%8.51%7.81%11.98%-10.37%3.88%5.36%14.35%-2.50%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PGHY and BBHY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.42

The correlation between PGHY and BBHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.55 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PGHY vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PGHY
BBHY

Financial Services

8.8%
4.1%

Communication Services

6.2%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
10.0%

Basic Materials

5.6%
3.2%

Energy

3.6%
5.2%

Industrials

3.5%
8.4%

Healthcare

2.5%
5.4%

Technology

1.7%
4.0%

Utilities

1.5%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
2.5%

Real Estate

0.5%
3.9%

Financial Services

PGHY
8.8%
BBHY
4.1%

Communication Services

PGHY
6.2%
BBHY
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PGHY
5.7%
BBHY
10.0%

Basic Materials

PGHY
5.6%
BBHY
3.2%

Energy

PGHY
3.6%
BBHY
5.2%

Industrials

PGHY
3.5%
BBHY
8.4%

Healthcare

PGHY
2.5%
BBHY
5.4%

Technology

PGHY
1.7%
BBHY
4.0%

Utilities

PGHY
1.5%
BBHY
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

PGHY
1.4%
BBHY
2.5%

Real Estate

PGHY
0.5%
BBHY
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGHY vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGHY
PGHY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PGHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGHY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PGHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGHY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BBHY
BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGHY vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGHYBBHYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.98

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

3.01

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

3.02

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.32

13.58

-3.26

PGHY vs. BBHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the BBHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGHY and BBHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGHYBBHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.98

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.57

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.64

-0.04

Drawdowns

PGHY vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGHY drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGHY and BBHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGHYBBHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

-24.98%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-2.37%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

-5.00%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.42%

-15.32%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.30%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-2.37%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.53%

+0.25%

Volatility

PGHY vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) at 1.12%. This indicates that PGHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGHYBBHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

1.12%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.67%

2.86%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.01%

3.62%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.44%

7.26%

-1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.04%

7.53%

-0.49%

PGHY vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGHY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGHY vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison

PGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, more than BBHY's 6.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.95%7.24%7.18%6.49%5.92%4.06%4.73%4.99%5.02%4.81%1.42%0.00%
PGHY
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
7.09%7.24%7.49%7.87%5.12%5.17%5.45%5.32%5.45%5.52%6.26%4.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGHY and BBHY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGHY has higher volatility (1.92%) compared to BBHY (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGHY dropped -20.50% vs BBHY's -24.98%.

On 5-year performance, PGHY leads with 4.59% vs 4.09% for BBHY. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PGHY has performed better with a 4.59% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PGHY.

PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.09%, compared with 6.95% for BBHY.

PGHY tracks DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index, while BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PGHY and 0.15% for BBHY.

BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGHY and BBHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer