PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGGIX vs. PRSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGGIX vs. PRSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Global Income Trust (PGGIX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGGIX achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than PRSNX's 1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, PGGIX has underperformed PRSNX with an annualized return of 0.61%, while PRSNX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.90% annualized return.


PGGIX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.59%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.46%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
-1.74%
10Y*
0.61%

PRSNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.82%
6M
3.04%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
8.29%
5Y*
2.12%
10Y*
3.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGGIX vs. PRSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGGIX
Putnam Global Income Trust
0.28%6.27%-0.26%5.27%-15.05%-6.38%5.93%9.35%-2.36%7.24%
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
1.82%9.31%5.60%12.77%-16.27%0.40%8.16%11.94%0.45%6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PGGIX and PRSNX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2008

0.53

The correlation between PGGIX and PRSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGGIX vs. PRSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGGIX
PGGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
PGGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PGGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

PRSNX
PRSNX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PRSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGGIX vs. PRSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Income Trust (PGGIX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGGIXPRSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.67

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

3.66

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.93

16.41

-13.48

PGGIX vs. PRSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the PRSNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGGIX and PRSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGGIXPRSNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

2.77

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

0.50

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.95

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

1.43

-0.64

Drawdowns

PGGIX vs. PRSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGGIX drawdown since its inception was -26.81%, which is greater than PRSNX's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGGIX and PRSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGGIXPRSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.81%

-19.70%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-2.18%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.60%

-2.87%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-19.70%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.24%

-19.70%

-5.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.15%

-0.10%

-11.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-2.36%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.48%

+0.57%

Volatility

PGGIX vs. PRSNX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Global Income Trust (PGGIX) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) at 0.83%. This indicates that PGGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGGIXPRSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

0.83%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

2.31%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

2.88%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.16%

4.30%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.55%

4.13%

+0.42%

PGGIX vs. PRSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGGIX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than PRSNX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGGIX vs. PRSNX - Dividend Comparison

PGGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than PRSNX's 6.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGGIX
Putnam Global Income Trust
3.34%3.86%2.79%2.17%2.06%1.72%1.65%2.04%2.42%3.17%3.29%2.44%
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
6.63%7.87%6.36%5.08%3.30%3.95%3.68%6.33%4.89%3.59%3.44%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGGIX and PRSNX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGGIX has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to PRSNX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGGIX dropped -26.81% vs PRSNX's -19.70%.

PRSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGGIX and PRSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer