PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGGIX vs. DFGBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGGIX vs. DFGBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Global Income Trust (PGGIX) and DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGGIX achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than DFGBX's 1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PGGIX has underperformed DFGBX with an annualized return of 0.35%, while DFGBX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.21% annualized return.


PGGIX

1D
0.30%
1M
-0.72%
6M
-0.77%
YTD
-0.40%
1Y
1.27%
3Y*
3.15%
5Y*
-1.90%
10Y*
0.35%
ALL TIME*
4.24%

DFGBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.30%
6M
1.00%
YTD
1.50%
1Y
3.14%
3Y*
4.11%
5Y*
1.16%
10Y*
1.21%
ALL TIME*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PGGIX vs. DFGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGGIX
Putnam Global Income Trust
-0.40%6.27%-0.26%5.27%-15.05%-6.38%5.93%9.35%-2.36%7.24%
DFGBX
DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
1.50%3.13%5.37%5.00%-6.63%-1.03%1.52%4.04%1.68%0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PGGIX and DFGBX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1990

0.38

Over the past year, PGGIX and DFGBX have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGGIX vs. DFGBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PGGIX
PGGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PGGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PGGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

DFGBX
DFGBX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DFGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DFGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PGGIX vs. DFGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Income Trust (PGGIX) and DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGGIXDFGBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.53

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

2.37

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.59

8.15

-6.56

PGGIX vs. DFGBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the DFGBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGGIX and DFGBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGGIX vs. DFGBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGGIX drawdown since its inception was -26.81%, which is greater than DFGBX's maximum drawdown of -9.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGGIX and DFGBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGGIXDFGBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.81%

-9.63%

-17.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-1.38%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.60%

-1.67%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.33%

-9.63%

-13.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.24%

-9.63%

-15.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.75%

-0.30%

-11.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-0.93%

-3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

0.40%

+0.84%

Volatility

PGGIX vs. DFGBX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Global Income Trust (PGGIX) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) at 0.51%. This indicates that PGGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGGIXDFGBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.51%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

1.41%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

1.55%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.17%

2.18%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.53%

1.92%

+2.61%

PGGIX vs. DFGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGGIX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGBX's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGGIX vs. DFGBX - Dividend Comparison

PGGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than DFGBX's 4.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFGBX
DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
4.61%2.91%4.69%3.61%1.63%0.73%0.03%2.30%4.74%0.89%1.16%1.72%
PGGIX
Putnam Global Income Trust
3.22%3.86%2.79%2.17%2.06%1.72%1.65%2.04%2.42%3.17%3.29%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGGIX and DFGBX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGGIX has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to DFGBX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGGIX dropped -26.81% vs DFGBX's -9.63%.

DFGBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGGIX and DFGBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer