PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGGAX vs. GCCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGGAX vs. GCCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Global Growth Portfolio Class A (PGGAX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGGAX achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than GCCHX's 27.68% return.


PGGAX

1D
-0.64%
1M
4.78%
YTD
12.39%
6M
13.34%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
12.47%

GCCHX

1D
-0.90%
1M
4.26%
YTD
27.68%
6M
28.65%
1Y
80.76%
3Y*
5.87%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGGAX vs. GCCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGGAX
American Funds Global Growth Portfolio Class A
12.39%23.05%14.85%24.09%-25.77%12.98%27.38%27.93%-8.97%18.04%
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
27.68%39.25%-25.63%-6.85%-10.39%21.84%42.82%27.36%-16.35%26.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PGGAX and GCCHX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2017

0.76

The correlation between PGGAX and GCCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGGAX vs. GCCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGGAX
PGGAX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PGGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
PGGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

GCCHX
GCCHX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GCCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGGAX vs. GCCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Growth Portfolio Class A (PGGAX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGGAXGCCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.54

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

6.93

-4.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

22.54

-10.83

PGGAX vs. GCCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the GCCHX Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGGAX and GCCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGGAXGCCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

3.47

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.14

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.44

+0.31

Drawdowns

PGGAX vs. GCCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGGAX drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, smaller than the maximum GCCHX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGGAX and GCCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGGAXGCCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.41%

-54.32%

+19.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-11.76%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.99%

-52.03%

+34.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-54.32%

+19.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.90%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-13.91%

+8.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

3.61%

-1.07%

Volatility

PGGAX vs. GCCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Global Growth Portfolio Class A (PGGAX) is 4.52%, while GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that PGGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGGAXGCCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

6.54%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

16.28%

-4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

23.58%

-9.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

26.96%

-9.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

25.15%

-7.87%

PGGAX vs. GCCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGGAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCHX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGGAX vs. GCCHX - Dividend Comparison

PGGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than GCCHX's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
1.18%1.51%0.66%0.96%2.24%25.43%5.42%4.03%2.62%3.43%0.00%0.00%
PGGAX
American Funds Global Growth Portfolio Class A
4.99%5.61%4.31%0.95%7.97%3.34%0.78%4.90%5.69%6.22%3.70%3.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGGAX and GCCHX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCCHX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to PGGAX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGGAX dropped -34.41% vs GCCHX's -54.32%.

GCCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGGAX and GCCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer