PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PG vs. SGSOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PG vs. SGSOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and SGS SA (SGSOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly higher than SGSOY's 2.07% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has outperformed SGSOY with an annualized return of 8.96%, while SGSOY has yielded a comparatively lower 6.15% annualized return.


PG

1D
0.86%
1M
5.18%
YTD
5.93%
6M
6.28%
1Y
-5.68%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
8.96%

SGSOY

1D
-0.62%
1M
3.42%
YTD
2.07%
6M
6.37%
1Y
10.93%
3Y*
9.92%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*
6.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PG vs. SGSOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
5.93%-12.26%17.25%-0.86%-5.05%20.52%14.15%39.70%3.57%12.69%
SGSOY
SGS SA
2.07%19.14%20.15%-4.05%-29.29%16.08%12.53%23.36%-12.00%35.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PG and SGSOY is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PG:

$361.53B

SGSOY:

$21.59B

EPS

PG:

$5.23

SGSOY:

CHF 0.65

PE Ratio

PG:

28.63

SGSOY:

13.72

PEG Ratio

PG:

7.00

SGSOY:

7.42

PS Ratio

PG:

4.20

SGSOY:

1.25

PB Ratio

PG:

6.70

SGSOY:

19.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

PG:

$86.72B

SGSOY:

CHF 13.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PG:

$43.64B

SGSOY:

CHF 8.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

PG:

$22.63B

SGSOY:

CHF 2.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PG vs. SGSOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SGSOY
SGSOY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SGSOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGSOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGSOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SGSOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGSOY Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PG vs. SGSOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and SGS SA (SGSOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGSGSOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.11

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

0.61

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.68

1.78

-2.46

PG vs. SGSOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PG Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the SGSOY Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PG and SGSOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PG vs. SGSOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, roughly equal to the maximum SGSOY drawdown of -53.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and SGSOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGSGSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.25%

-53.49%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.52%

-17.90%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-23.22%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.77%

-36.92%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

-36.92%

+13.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.29%

-7.60%

-5.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.16%

-12.25%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.80%

6.17%

+2.63%

Volatility

PG vs. SGSOY - Volatility Comparison

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to SGS SA (SGSOY) at 4.83%. This indicates that PG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGSOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGSGSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

4.83%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

15.23%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.78%

20.80%

-2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

22.85%

-5.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

21.44%

-2.39%

Dividends

PG vs. SGSOY - Dividend Comparison

PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than SGSOY's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.85%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%
SGSOY
SGS SA
3.67%3.19%3.64%3.96%3.72%2.52%1.61%1.69%2.10%4.35%5.56%2.04%

Financials

PG vs. SGSOY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and SGS SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
21.24B
3.49B
(PG) Total Revenue
(SGSOY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PG values in USD, SGSOY values in CHF

PG vs. SGSOY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Procter & Gamble Company and SGS SA over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
49.5%
37.9%
Portfolio components
PG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

SGSOY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SGS SA reported a gross profit of 1.32B and revenue of 3.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.

PG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

SGSOY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SGS SA reported an operating income of 561.32M and revenue of 3.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

PG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.

SGSOY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SGS SA reported a net income of 351.08M and revenue of 3.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PG and SGSOY have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PG has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to SGSOY (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs SGSOY's -53.49%.

SGSOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PG and SGSOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer