PG vs. PLTR
PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) and PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) are both stocks. PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while PLTR operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, PG returned 4.10%/yr vs 41.37%/yr for PLTR. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
PG vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -23.22% return.
PG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- -8.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
PLTR
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -24.81%
- 1Y
- 6.85%
- 3Y*
- 108.67%
- 5Y*
- 41.37%
- 10Y*
- —
PG vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.74% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 0.66% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -23.22% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 147.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between PG and PLTR is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020 | -0.09 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PG and PLTR has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.09 to -0.31, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Fundamentals
PG:
$350.63B
PLTR:
$350.85B
PG:
$5.23
PLTR:
$0.89
PG:
27.76
PLTR:
153.57
PG:
6.79
PLTR:
0.89
PG:
4.07
PLTR:
67.07
PG:
6.50
PLTR:
41.52
PG:
$86.72B
PLTR:
$5.22B
PG:
$43.64B
PLTR:
$4.39B
PG:
$22.63B
PLTR:
$2.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PG vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
PG
PLTR
PG vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PG | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.07 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 0.18 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 0.33 | -1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PG | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 0.14 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.64 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.86 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
PG vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PG | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.25% | -84.62% | +30.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -38.19% | +22.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -40.61% | +19.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -79.14% | +55.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.91% | -34.13% | +18.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -40.29% | +28.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.93% | 20.71% | -11.78% |
Volatility
PG vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is 7.01%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.24%. This indicates that PG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PG | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 17.24% | -10.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.32% | 38.35% | -23.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 50.93% | -32.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 65.44% | -47.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 69.81% | -50.76% |
Dividends
PG vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.94% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PG vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PG vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
PLTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
PLTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
PLTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PG and PLTR have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.24%) compared to PG (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
PLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PG and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer