PG vs. PASG

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) and PASG (Passage Bio, Inc.) are both stocks. PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while PASG operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, PG returned 4.73%/yr vs -54.00%/yr for PASG. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PG vs. PASG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly higher than PASG's -50.76% return.

PG

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: 5.93%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: -5.68%
• 3Y*: 3.69%
• 5Y*: 4.73%
• 10Y*: 8.96%

PASG

• 1D: 3.75%
• 1M: 5.25%
• YTD: -50.76%
• 6M: -40.68%
• 1Y: -32.71%
• 3Y*: -32.32%
• 5Y*: -54.00%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PG vs. PASG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	5.93%	-12.26%	17.25%	-0.86%	-5.05%	20.52%	24.88%
PASG Passage Bio, Inc.	-50.76%	4.04%	-43.85%	-26.81%	-78.27%	-75.17%	14.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PG and PASG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020	0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap PG : $361.53B PASG : $18.63M
EPS PG : $5.23 PASG : -$11.85
PB Ratio PG : 6.70 PASG : 1.58
Total Revenue (TTM) PG : $86.72B PASG : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) PG : $43.64B PASG : -$377.00K
EBITDA (TTM) PG : $22.63B PASG : -$35.03M

Return for Risk

PG vs. PASG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PG

PG Risk / Return Rank: 28
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 26
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 31

PASG

PASG Risk / Return Rank: 35
PASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
PASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PASG Omega Ratio Rank: 42
PASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
PASG Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PG vs. PASG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PG	PASG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.30	-0.27	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.31	0.46	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.06	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.37	-0.41	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.68	-0.77	+0.09

PG vs. PASG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PG Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is comparable to the PASG Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PG and PASG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PG vs. PASG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, smaller than the maximum PASG drawdown of -99.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and PASG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PG	PASG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.25%	-99.43%	+45.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.52%	-79.45%	+63.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.15%	-88.21%	+67.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.77%	-98.69%	+74.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.29%	-99.19%	+85.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.16%	-82.82%	+70.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.80%	42.35%	-33.55%

Volatility

PG vs. PASG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is 6.99%, while Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG) has a volatility of 17.49%. This indicates that PG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PASG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PG	PASG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.99%	17.49%	-10.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.01%	100.45%	-85.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.78%	122.61%	-103.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.82%	100.91%	-83.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.05%	99.26%	-80.21%

Dividends

PG vs. PASG - Dividend Comparison

PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, while PASG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PASG Passage Bio, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	2.85%	2.91%	2.36%	2.55%	2.38%	2.08%	2.24%	2.37%	3.09%	2.98%	3.18%	3.31%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PG and PASG in my portfolio?

PG and PASG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PG or PASG?

PASG has higher volatility (17.49%) compared to PG (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs PASG's -99.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PASG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.27 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.