PG vs. BNP.PA
PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) and BNP.PA (BNP Paribas SA) are both stocks. PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while BNP.PA operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, PG returned 8.96%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for BNP.PA. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PG vs. BNP.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PG is traded in USD, while BNP.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the BNP.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than BNP.PA's 21.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has underperformed BNP.PA with an annualized return of 8.96%, while BNP.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.11% annualized return.
PG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- -3.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
BNP.PA
- 1D
- 5.05%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- 21.35%
- 6M
- 25.61%
- 1Y
- 36.95%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 18.55%
- 10Y*
- 15.11%
PG vs. BNP.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 5.93% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
BNP.PA BNP Paribas SA | 21.35% | 70.31% | -5.26% | 29.71% | -11.60% | 37.79% | -11.18% | 40.85% | -36.18% | 22.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PG and BNP.PA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007 | 0.18 |
The correlation between PG and BNP.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (3 years) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PG vs. BNP.PA — Risk / Return Rank
PG
BNP.PA
PG vs. BNP.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and BNP Paribas SA (BNP.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PG | BNP.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.22 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 1.67 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 4.16 | -4.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PG vs. BNP.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, smaller than the maximum BNP.PA drawdown of -76.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and BNP.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PG | BNP.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.25% | -76.48% | +22.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -20.36% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -21.05% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -42.50% | +18.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.77% | -64.31% | +40.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.29% | 0.00% | -13.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -26.76% | +14.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.80% | 8.21% | +0.59% |
Volatility
PG vs. BNP.PA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is 6.99%, while BNP Paribas SA (BNP.PA) has a volatility of 8.45%. This indicates that PG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNP.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PG | BNP.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 8.45% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.01% | 22.62% | -7.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.78% | 29.98% | -11.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 31.07% | -13.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 32.92% | -13.87% |
Dividends
PG vs. BNP.PA - Dividend Comparison
PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than BNP.PA's 5.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNP.PA BNP Paribas SA | 5.34% | 9.13% | 7.77% | 6.23% | 6.89% | 4.38% | 0.00% | 5.72% | 7.65% | 4.34% | 3.82% | 2.87% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
PG vs. BNP.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and BNP Paribas SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PG and BNP.PA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PG and BNP.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer