PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PG vs. AVNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PG vs. AVNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Avient Corporation (AVNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than AVNT's 21.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has outperformed AVNT with an annualized return of 8.96%, while AVNT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.45% annualized return.


PG

1D
0.86%
1M
5.18%
YTD
5.93%
6M
6.28%
1Y
-5.68%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
8.96%

AVNT

1D
3.40%
1M
9.99%
YTD
21.85%
6M
22.95%
1Y
9.14%
3Y*
0.46%
5Y*
-3.52%
10Y*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PG vs. AVNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
5.93%-12.26%17.25%-0.86%-5.05%20.52%14.15%39.70%3.57%12.69%
AVNT
Avient Corporation
21.85%-21.17%0.62%26.38%-38.23%41.33%12.93%31.90%-33.01%37.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PG and AVNT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 1999

0.26

The correlation between PG and AVNT shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PG:

$361.53B

AVNT:

$3.47B

EPS

PG:

$5.23

AVNT:

$1.72

PE Ratio

PG:

28.63

AVNT:

21.97

PEG Ratio

PG:

7.00

AVNT:

0.47

PS Ratio

PG:

4.20

AVNT:

1.06

PB Ratio

PG:

6.70

AVNT:

1.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

PG:

$86.72B

AVNT:

$3.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PG:

$43.64B

AVNT:

$1.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

PG:

$22.63B

AVNT:

$481.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PG vs. AVNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

AVNT
AVNT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AVNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVNT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
AVNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVNT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PG vs. AVNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Avient Corporation (AVNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGAVNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.07

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

0.34

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.68

0.69

-1.37

PG vs. AVNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PG Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the AVNT Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PG and AVNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PG vs. AVNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, smaller than the maximum AVNT drawdown of -89.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and AVNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGAVNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.25%

-89.80%

+35.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.52%

-26.89%

+11.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-46.88%

+25.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.77%

-52.94%

+29.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

-76.89%

+53.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.29%

-30.39%

+17.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.16%

-28.85%

+16.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.80%

13.37%

-4.57%

Volatility

PG vs. AVNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is 6.99%, while Avient Corporation (AVNT) has a volatility of 10.37%. This indicates that PG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGAVNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

10.37%

-3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

23.62%

-8.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.78%

33.79%

-15.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

36.99%

-19.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

39.88%

-20.83%

Dividends

PG vs. AVNT - Dividend Comparison

PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than AVNT's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVNT
Avient Corporation
2.89%3.47%2.55%2.41%2.84%1.56%2.04%2.14%2.52%1.33%1.54%1.32%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.85%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%

Financials

PG vs. AVNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and Avient Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
21.24B
847.40M
(PG) Total Revenue
(AVNT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PG vs. AVNT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Procter & Gamble Company and Avient Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
49.5%
32.2%
Portfolio components
PG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

AVNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avient Corporation reported a gross profit of 272.60M and revenue of 847.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.2%.

PG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

AVNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avient Corporation reported an operating income of 95.80M and revenue of 847.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

PG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.

AVNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avient Corporation reported a net income of 55.70M and revenue of 847.40M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PG and AVNT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVNT has higher volatility (10.37%) compared to PG (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs AVNT's -89.80%.

AVNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PG and AVNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer