PFSVX vs. HWSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund (PFSVX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX).
PFSVX is managed by iM Global Partner Fund Management. It was launched on Jul 30, 2020. HWSAX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jun 10, 2000.
Performance
PFSVX vs. HWSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFSVX vs. HWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFSVX iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund | -6.21% | -0.02% | 14.04% | 24.90% | -13.39% | 19.74% | 27.10% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 7.13% | 1.38% | 4.77% | 18.56% | 2.81% | 35.32% | 37.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFSVX achieves a -6.21% return, which is significantly lower than HWSAX's 7.13% return.
PFSVX
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -6.21%
- 6M
- -4.99%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- —
HWSAX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- 16.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFSVX vs. HWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFSVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HWSAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PFSVX vs. HWSAX — Risk / Return Rank
PFSVX
HWSAX
PFSVX vs. HWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund (PFSVX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFSVX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 0.72 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.15 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.16 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 0.91 | -0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 3.37 | -2.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFSVX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 0.72 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.42 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFSVX and HWSAX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PFSVX vs. HWSAX - Dividend Comparison
PFSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than HWSAX's 0.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFSVX iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund | 4.54% | 4.26% | 17.23% | 7.81% | 0.00% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 0.65% | 0.69% | 8.19% | 1.79% | 13.39% | 0.22% | 0.63% | 4.62% | 9.45% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 11.67% |
Drawdowns
PFSVX vs. HWSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFSVX drawdown since its inception was -30.18%, smaller than the maximum HWSAX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSVX and HWSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFSVX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.18% | -72.14% | +41.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.56% | -16.44% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.18% | -26.98% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.44% | -2.78% | -11.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -11.03% | +1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.82% | 4.43% | +0.39% |
Volatility
PFSVX vs. HWSAX - Volatility Comparison
iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund (PFSVX) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that PFSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFSVX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | 4.15% | +2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.29% | 12.90% | +1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.45% | 23.98% | +1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 21.70% | +0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.64% | 24.64% | -2.00% |