PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSVX vs. MSILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFSVX vs. MSILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund (PFSVX) and iMGP International Fund (MSILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSVX achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly higher than MSILX's 7.93% return.


PFSVX

1D
1.04%
1M
-2.13%
6M
7.36%
YTD
11.34%
1Y
18.11%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.08%

MSILX

1D
2.79%
1M
-0.91%
6M
3.37%
YTD
7.93%
1Y
19.77%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
6.97%
ALL TIME*
7.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PFSVX vs. MSILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFSVX
iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund
11.34%-0.02%14.04%24.90%-13.39%19.74%27.10%
MSILX
iMGP International Fund
7.93%30.20%-0.58%17.41%-21.57%11.82%30.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSVX and MSILX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020

0.65

The correlation between PFSVX and MSILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSVX vs. MSILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFSVX
PFSVX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PFSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MSILX
MSILX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MSILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSILX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MSILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSILX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFSVX vs. MSILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund (PFSVX) and iMGP International Fund (MSILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFSVXMSILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.19

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

1.36

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.20

4.94

-1.73

PFSVX vs. MSILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the MSILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSVX and MSILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFSVX vs. MSILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSVX drawdown since its inception was -30.18%, smaller than the maximum MSILX drawdown of -60.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSVX and MSILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSVXMSILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.18%

-60.45%

+30.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.16%

-12.70%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.18%

-15.73%

-14.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.18%

-34.92%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-1.44%

-2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.95%

-15.72%

+6.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.51%

3.48%

+1.03%

Volatility

PFSVX vs. MSILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund (PFSVX) is 4.56%, while iMGP International Fund (MSILX) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that PFSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSVXMSILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

5.04%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.47%

13.52%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.18%

15.89%

+4.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

18.19%

+4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.49%

19.10%

+3.39%

PFSVX vs. MSILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFSVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MSILX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFSVX vs. MSILX - Dividend Comparison

PFSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than MSILX's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSILX
iMGP International Fund
1.44%1.55%1.24%1.01%0.88%3.70%2.23%2.99%0.74%2.94%4.15%1.68%
PFSVX
iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund
3.82%4.26%17.23%7.81%0.00%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFSVX and MSILX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSILX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to PFSVX (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSVX dropped -30.18% vs MSILX's -60.45%.

MSILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSVX and MSILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer