PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSLX vs. FSMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFSLX vs. FSMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX) and Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSLX achieves a 46.57% return, which is significantly higher than FSMBX's 10.31% return.


PFSLX

1D
0.76%
1M
9.94%
YTD
46.57%
6M
43.69%
1Y
81.70%
3Y*
29.34%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
17.81%

FSMBX

1D
-0.06%
1M
3.10%
YTD
10.31%
6M
8.88%
1Y
12.88%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
5.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFSLX vs. FSMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PFSLX
Paradigm Select Fund
46.57%13.27%16.73%26.94%-26.44%31.16%26.05%13.93%
FSMBX
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund
10.31%-5.43%9.81%15.38%-13.81%33.39%12.72%10.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSLX and FSMBX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.86

The correlation between PFSLX and FSMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSLX vs. FSMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSLX
PFSLX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PFSLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMBX
FSMBX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FSMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSLX vs. FSMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX) and Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFSLXFSMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.17

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.65

1.33

+6.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.34

3.47

+25.88

PFSLX vs. FSMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSLX Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is higher than the FSMBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSLX and FSMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFSLX vs. FSMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSLX drawdown since its inception was -91.83%, which is greater than FSMBX's maximum drawdown of -37.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSLX and FSMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSLXFSMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.83%

-37.37%

-54.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-10.79%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.83%

-25.22%

-66.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.83%

-25.22%

-66.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.26%

-3.64%

-78.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.89%

-7.68%

-6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

4.14%

-1.30%

Volatility

PFSLX vs. FSMBX - Volatility Comparison

Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund (FSMBX) at 3.70%. This indicates that PFSLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSLXFSMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.66%

3.70%

+6.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.93%

10.72%

+10.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.15%

15.48%

+10.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.11%

18.75%

+127.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.50%

21.88%

+82.62%

PFSLX vs. FSMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFSLX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMBX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFSLX vs. FSMBX - Dividend Comparison

PFSLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than FSMBX's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMBX
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Fund
0.55%0.61%0.14%0.28%1.83%3.47%0.23%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFSLX
Paradigm Select Fund
0.10%0.14%0.02%0.31%0.01%0.17%0.11%0.58%2.93%3.89%0.74%9.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFSLX and FSMBX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFSLX has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to FSMBX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSLX dropped -91.83% vs FSMBX's -37.37%.

PFSLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSLX and FSMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer