PFOE vs. QWLD
PFOE (Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF) and QWLD (SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. PFOE is actively managed, while QWLD is passively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PFOE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for QWLD.
Performance
PFOE vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFOE achieves a -9.13% return, which is significantly lower than QWLD's 9.39% return.
PFOE
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -10.62%
- YTD
- -9.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QWLD
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $315.87K | $800.41K | $1.21M | |
| $231.12K | $297.84K | $1.04M |
PFOE vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PFOE Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF | -9.13% | -1.29% |
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | 9.39% | -0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFOE and QWLD is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFOE vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank
PFOE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QWLD
PFOE vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF (PFOE) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFOE | QWLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.44 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFOE vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFOE drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, smaller than the maximum QWLD drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFOE and QWLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFOE | QWLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.19% | -31.89% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.94% | 0.00% | -13.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.07% | -3.66% | -6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.75% | — |
Volatility
PFOE vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFOE | QWLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 9.71% | +8.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 13.51% | +4.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 15.12% | +3.34% |
PFOE vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFOE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFOE vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison
PFOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than QWLD's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFOE Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | 1.79% | 1.85% | 1.74% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.77% | 1.77% | 2.13% | 2.33% | 2.73% | 2.22% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFOE and QWLD have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QWLD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QWLD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PFOE.
QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.22% for PFOE.
They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFOE and 0.30% for QWLD.
Find the right allocation for PFOE and QWLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer