PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFOE vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFOE vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF (PFOE) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PFOE

1D
-1.12%
1M
-4.67%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMTM

1D
-4.66%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
25.27%
6M
26.43%
1Y
56.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFOE vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PFOE and FMTM is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFOE vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFOE

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFOE vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF (PFOE) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PFOE vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFOEFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.03

2.06

-3.09

Drawdowns

PFOE vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFOE drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFOE and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFOEFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.19%

-12.12%

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.61%

-4.91%

-8.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-1.89%

-7.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

Volatility

PFOE vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFOEFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.98%

23.34%

-4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.98%

23.29%

-4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.98%

23.29%

-4.31%

PFOE vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFOE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFOE vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

PFOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than FMTM's 0.24% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


PFOE and FMTM have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PFOE.

FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.04% for PFOE.

PFOE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFOE and 0.45% for FMTM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFOE and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer