PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFN vs. PFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PFN vs. PFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) and Perpetual Global Income Fund (PFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PFN vs. PFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFN
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II
-5.40%13.07%15.72%15.43%-17.65%5.14%3.97%21.84%0.94%20.58%
PFL
Perpetual Global Income Fund
1.21%13.03%11.51%17.29%-17.92%4.62%7.11%19.65%2.06%21.26%

Returns By Period


PFN

1D
3.77%
1M
-3.87%
YTD
-5.40%
6M
-3.80%
1Y
2.70%
3Y*
11.05%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
8.36%

PFL

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PFN vs. PFL - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

PFN vs. PFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFN
PFN Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
PFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFN Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

PFL
PFL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFN vs. PFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) and Perpetual Global Income Fund (PFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFNPFLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.02

PFN vs. PFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFNPFLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

Correlation

The correlation between PFN and PFL is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PFN vs. PFL - Dividend Comparison

PFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.51%, more than PFL's 11.56% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFN
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II
12.51%11.49%11.57%11.92%12.19%9.71%9.67%9.07%10.81%9.20%10.12%11.74%
PFL
Perpetual Global Income Fund
9.63%11.59%11.66%11.57%12.04%9.53%9.44%9.11%9.94%9.25%10.22%11.09%

Drawdowns

PFN vs. PFL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PFNPFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.08%

-77.97%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-9.77%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.45%

-33.30%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.70%

-48.40%

+2.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.42%

0.00%

-6.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.89%

-11.11%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.84%

+0.95%

Volatility

PFN vs. PFL - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PFNPFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%