PFN vs. PCRPX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PFN (PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II) and PCRPX (PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - PFN is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by PIMCO, while PCRPX is a Commodities fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, PFN returned 8.29%/yr vs 7.92%/yr for PCRPX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFN charges 1.74%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for PCRPX.

Performance

PFN vs. PCRPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) and PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFN achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly lower than PCRPX's 20.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PFN having a 8.29% annualized return and PCRPX not far behind at 7.92%.

PFN

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 5.28%
• 6M: 2.69%
• YTD: 2.44%
• 1Y: 8.88%
• 3Y*: 13.37%
• 5Y*: 2.53%
• 10Y*: 8.29%

PCRPX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 2.03%
• 6M: 16.02%
• YTD: 20.62%
• 1Y: 28.77%
• 3Y*: 14.90%
• 5Y*: 11.06%
• 10Y*: 7.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFN vs. PCRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PFN PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II	2.44%	13.07%	15.72%	15.43%	-17.65%	5.14%	3.97%	21.84%	0.94%	20.58%
PCRPX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund	20.62%	16.26%	10.79%	-6.20%	9.12%	33.01%	0.73%	12.24%	-13.90%	2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PFN and PCRPX is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2008	0.19

The correlation between PFN and PCRPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PFN vs. PCRPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFN

PFN Risk / Return Rank: 16
PFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
PFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
PFN Omega Ratio Rank: 18
PFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
PFN Martin Ratio Rank: 15

PCRPX

PCRPX Risk / Return Rank: 53
PCRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
PCRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
PCRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
PCRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
PCRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFN vs. PCRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) and PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFN	PCRPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	1.80	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	2.36	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.32	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.83	2.07	-1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.02	7.23	-4.21

PFN vs. PCRPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFN Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the PCRPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFN and PCRPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PFN vs. PCRPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFN drawdown since its inception was -80.08%, which is greater than PCRPX's maximum drawdown of -72.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFN and PCRPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFN	PCRPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.08%	-72.22%	-7.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.77%	-14.44%	+3.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.31%	-14.44%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.45%	-34.54%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.70%	-39.15%	-6.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.88%	+8.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.77%	-39.23%	+27.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	4.12%	-1.17%

Volatility

PFN vs. PCRPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) is 2.42%, while PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that PFN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFN	PCRPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.42%	4.58%	-2.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.82%	13.97%	-5.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.29%	16.61%	-6.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.64%	19.69%	-5.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.18%	17.10%	+1.08%

PFN vs. PCRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFN has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PCRPX's 0.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFN vs. PCRPX - Dividend Comparison

PFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.03%, more than PCRPX's 10.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCRPX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund	10.11%	5.09%	8.47%	6.50%	46.40%	22.80%	1.51%	3.93%	5.85%	8.06%	0.83%	5.23%
PFN PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II	12.03%	11.49%	11.57%	11.92%	12.19%	9.71%	9.67%	9.07%	10.81%	9.20%	10.12%	11.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFN and PCRPX in my portfolio?

PFN and PCRPX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFN or PCRPX?

PCRPX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to PFN (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFN dropped -80.08% vs PCRPX's -72.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCRPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.