MMT vs. EVG
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund (EVG).
MMT is managed by MFS Investment Management. It was launched on Mar 12, 1987. EVG is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Feb 28, 2005.
Performance
MMT vs. EVG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MMT vs. EVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMT MFS Multimarket Income Trust | 1.53% | 8.10% | 12.40% | 10.14% | -22.96% | 13.11% | 8.88% | 30.32% | -7.70% | 9.29% |
EVG Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund | -0.06% | 8.43% | 14.80% | 11.90% | -14.12% | 17.10% | -1.68% | 16.48% | -7.59% | 10.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMT achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly higher than EVG's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MMT has outperformed EVG with an annualized return of 6.50%, while EVG has yielded a comparatively lower 6.08% annualized return.
MMT
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 8.31%
- 3Y*
- 9.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.50%
EVG
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- -1.61%
- 1Y
- 5.61%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.09%
- 10Y*
- 6.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MMT vs. EVG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than EVG's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MMT vs. EVG — Risk / Return Rank
MMT
EVG
MMT vs. EVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund (EVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMT | EVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 0.52 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 0.78 | +0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.12 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 0.81 | +0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 3.00 | +1.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMT | EVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 0.52 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.42 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.47 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.34 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between MMT and EVG is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MMT vs. EVG - Dividend Comparison
MMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.71%, more than EVG's 8.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMT MFS Multimarket Income Trust | 8.71% | 8.65% | 8.65% | 8.65% | 9.38% | 7.86% | 8.07% | 8.16% | 9.86% | 8.83% | 8.71% | 9.05% |
EVG Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund | 8.35% | 8.15% | 8.69% | 9.18% | 12.40% | 8.75% | 6.67% | 6.96% | 6.63% | 6.68% | 7.79% | 8.05% |
Drawdowns
MMT vs. EVG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMT drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, smaller than the maximum EVG drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMT and EVG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMT | EVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.70% | -40.60% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.74% | -6.88% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.29% | -23.35% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.70% | -32.75% | -2.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -2.66% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.26% | -6.27% | +1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.87% | +0.09% |
Volatility
MMT vs. EVG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) is 2.92%, while Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund (EVG) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that MMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MMT | EVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 4.30% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.79% | 6.11% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.05% | 10.89% | -1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.58% | 12.17% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 12.95% | +1.29% |