PFIX vs. RLY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PFIX (Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF) and RLY (SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both Hedge Fund funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFIX returned 16.86%/yr vs 10.43%/yr for RLY. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

PFIX vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFIX achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 17.13% return.

PFIX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -3.76%
• YTD: -2.55%
• 6M: 1.53%
• 1Y: -15.57%
• 3Y*: 14.54%
• 5Y*: 16.86%
• 10Y*: —

RLY

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 17.13%
• 6M: 18.27%
• 1Y: 31.78%
• 3Y*: 15.11%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: 8.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFIX vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF	-2.55%	0.42%	35.94%	5.67%	92.05%	-24.95%
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	17.13%	20.26%	2.53%	2.56%	7.86%	4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PFIX and RLY is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021	-0.07

PFIX vs. RLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PFIX	RLY
Financial Services	32.2%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	25.1%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.6%
Energy	-	30.1%
Healthcare	-	0.8%
Industrials	-	16.5%
Real Estate	-	5.4%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	15.9%

Return for Risk

PFIX vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFIX

PFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4
PFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
PFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
PFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
PFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

RLY

RLY Risk / Return Rank: 92
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 90
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFIX vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PFIX	RLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	3.17	-3.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.58	4.33	-4.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.60	-0.66
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.61	8.60	-9.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.96	31.17	-32.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PFIX vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the RLY Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFIX and RLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PFIX	RLY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.52	3.17	-3.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.77	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.38	+0.02

Drawdowns

PFIX vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFIX drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, roughly equal to the maximum RLY drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIX and RLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFIX	RLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.17%	-37.75%	+1.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.64%	-3.71%	-21.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.17%	-10.08%	-26.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.17%	-18.94%	-17.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.65%	-1.60%	-18.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.13%	-9.46%	-7.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.35%	1.02%	+15.33%

Volatility

PFIX vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) at 3.00%. This indicates that PFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFIX	RLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.51%	3.00%	+4.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.89%	8.15%	+12.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.32%	10.06%	+20.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.50%	13.54%	+24.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.35%	13.81%	+24.54%

PFIX vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PFIX and RLY have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

PFIX vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

PFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.96%, more than RLY's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF	9.96%	9.92%	3.40%	87.92%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	2.86%	3.24%	3.31%	3.71%	5.66%	12.15%	2.16%	3.45%	2.76%	1.85%	2.07%	1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFIX and RLY in my portfolio?

PFIX and RLY have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFIX or RLY?

PFIX has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to RLY (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIX dropped -36.17% vs RLY's -37.75%.

Which ETF is better, PFIX or RLY?

On 5-year performance, PFIX leads with 16.86% vs 10.43% for RLY. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PFIX or RLY?

Over the 5-year period, PFIX has performed better with a 16.86% return vs 10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFIX or RLY?

PFIX and RLY have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFIX or RLY?

PFIX has the higher dividend yield at 9.96%, compared with 2.86% for RLY.

What is the main difference between PFIX and RLY?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and State Street.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.