PFIG vs. SOXQ
PFIG (Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PFIG returned 5.21%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFIG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
PFIG vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFIG achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
PFIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.44%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFIG vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFIG Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.19% | 7.87% | 3.13% | 6.93% | -9.96% | -0.72% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFIG and SOXQ is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.16 |
PFIG vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFIG
SOXQ
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
PFIG
SOXQ
Industrials
PFIG
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
PFIG
SOXQ
-
Technology
PFIG
SOXQ
Consumer Cyclical
PFIG
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
PFIG
SOXQ
-
Energy
PFIG
SOXQ
-
Utilities
PFIG
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
PFIG
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
PFIG
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
PFIG
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFIG vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
PFIG
SOXQ
PFIG vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFIG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.72 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 11.73 | -9.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 45.01 | -36.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFIG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 5.43 | -3.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.98 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
PFIG vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFIG drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIG and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFIG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.58% | -46.01% | +30.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.94% | -15.59% | +13.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.52% | -39.36% | +35.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | 0.00% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -12.96% | +10.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 4.06% | -3.47% |
Volatility
PFIG vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) is 0.92%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that PFIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFIG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 13.44% | -12.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.19% | 26.70% | -24.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | 33.78% | -30.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 36.38% | -31.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 36.38% | -31.14% |
PFIG vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFIG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PFIG vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
PFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFIG Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.40% | 4.15% | 4.12% | 3.54% | 2.58% | 3.34% | 2.81% | 2.92% | 2.88% | 2.54% | 2.58% | 2.57% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFIG and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to PFIG (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIG dropped -15.58% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 5.21% for PFIG. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PFIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for PFIG.
PFIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
PFIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. PFIG tracks RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for PFIG and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFIG and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer