PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFIG vs. SCHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFIG vs. SCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFIG achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly higher than SCHI's -0.64% return.


PFIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.71%
6M
-0.39%
YTD
-0.08%
1Y
2.48%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
2.30%
ALL TIME*
2.73%

SCHI

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.31%
6M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.64%
1Y
2.20%
3Y*
5.81%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$904.23K$645.93K$461.69K
$42.16M$42.05M$59.83M

PFIG vs. SCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PFIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
-0.08%7.87%3.13%6.93%-9.96%-1.43%7.72%0.44%
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
-0.64%9.47%3.32%8.97%-14.06%-1.85%9.74%0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PFIG and SCHI is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019

0.86

The correlation between PFIG and SCHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFIG vs. SCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFIG
PFIG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PFIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHI
SCHI Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFIG vs. SCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFIGSCHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.13

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.02

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.46

2.90

+1.57

PFIG vs. SCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the SCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFIG and SCHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFIG vs. SCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFIG drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum SCHI drawdown of -20.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIG and SCHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFIGSCHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-20.67%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

-3.01%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.08%

-5.30%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

-20.62%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-2.18%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.45%

-5.61%

+3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

1.06%

-0.37%

Volatility

PFIG vs. SCHI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) is 0.84%, while Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that PFIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFIGSCHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

1.12%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.34%

3.31%

-0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

4.13%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

6.67%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.20%

7.34%

-2.14%

PFIG vs. SCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFIG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PFIG vs. SCHI - Dividend Comparison

PFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than SCHI's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.47%4.15%4.12%3.54%2.58%3.34%2.81%2.92%2.88%2.54%2.58%2.57%
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.65%4.99%5.11%4.27%3.10%1.93%2.31%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PFIG and SCHI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHI has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to PFIG (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIG dropped -15.58% vs SCHI's -20.67%.

On 5-year performance, PFIG leads with 1.03% vs 0.68% for SCHI. On fees, SCHI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PFIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFIG has performed better with a 1.03% return vs 0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for PFIG.

SCHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 4.47% for PFIG.

PFIG tracks RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index, while SCHI tracks Bloomberg US 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for PFIG and 0.03% for SCHI.

PFIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFIG and SCHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer