PFIG vs. QCON
PFIG (Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. PFIG is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. PFIG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
PFIG vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PFIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.44%
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFIG vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PFIG Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | -0.34% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
PFIG vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFIG
QCON
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
PFIG
QCON
Industrials
PFIG
QCON
Healthcare
PFIG
QCON
-
Technology
PFIG
QCON
-
Consumer Cyclical
PFIG
QCON
-
Consumer Defensive
PFIG
QCON
-
Energy
PFIG
QCON
-
Utilities
PFIG
QCON
Communication Services
PFIG
QCON
-
Real Estate
PFIG
QCON
-
Basic Materials
PFIG
QCON
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFIG vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
PFIG
QCON
PFIG vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFIG | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.38 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFIG | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PFIG vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFIG drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIG and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFIG | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.58% | 0.00% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | 0.00% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | 0.00% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | — | — |
Volatility
PFIG vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFIG | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | 0.00% | +3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 0.00% | +4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 0.00% | +5.24% |
PFIG vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFIG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFIG vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
PFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFIG Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.40% | 4.15% | 4.12% | 3.54% | 2.58% | 3.34% | 2.81% | 2.92% | 2.88% | 2.54% | 2.58% | 2.57% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PFIG is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PFIG is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
PFIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for PFIG and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for PFIG and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer