PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFIG vs. QCON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFIG vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PFIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.30%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
2.44%

QCON

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFIG vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison


PFIG vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFIG
QCON

Financial Services

15.2%
7.9%

Industrials

11.1%
1.0%

Healthcare

10.9%

-

Technology

10.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Energy

5.6%

-

Utilities

4.5%
1.5%

Communication Services

4.4%

-

Real Estate

4.2%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%

-

Financial Services

PFIG
15.2%
QCON
7.9%

Industrials

PFIG
11.1%
QCON
1.0%

Healthcare

PFIG
10.9%
QCON

-

Technology

PFIG
10.7%
QCON

-

Consumer Cyclical

PFIG
7.7%
QCON

-

Consumer Defensive

PFIG
6.3%
QCON

-

Energy

PFIG
5.6%
QCON

-

Utilities

PFIG
4.5%
QCON
1.5%

Communication Services

PFIG
4.4%
QCON

-

Real Estate

PFIG
4.2%
QCON

-

Basic Materials

PFIG
3.0%
QCON

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFIG vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFIG
PFIG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PFIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

QCON
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFIG vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFIGQCONDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.20

PFIG vs. QCON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFIGQCONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

Drawdowns

PFIG vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFIG drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIG and QCON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFIGQCONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

0.00%

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

0.00%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

0.00%

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

Volatility

PFIG vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFIGQCONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

0.00%

+3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

0.00%

+4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.24%

0.00%

+5.24%

PFIG vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFIG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFIG vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

PFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.40%4.15%4.12%3.54%2.58%3.34%2.81%2.92%2.88%2.54%2.58%2.57%
QCON
American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, PFIG is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PFIG is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

PFIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for PFIG and 0.32% for QCON.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFIG and QCON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer