PFIG vs. BESF
PFIG (Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. PFIG is passively managed, while BESF is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. PFIG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.
Performance
PFIG vs. BESF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFIG achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 19.74% return.
PFIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.44%
BESF
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- YTD
- 19.74%
- 6M
- 21.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFIG vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PFIG Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.19% | 4.35% |
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 19.74% | 41.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFIG and BESF is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFIG vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank
PFIG
BESF
PFIG vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFIG | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.38 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFIG | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 2.87 | -2.35 |
Drawdowns
PFIG vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFIG drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than BESF's maximum drawdown of -9.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIG and BESF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFIG | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.58% | -9.89% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -5.88% | +4.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -2.45% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | — | — |
Volatility
PFIG vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFIG | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | 24.33% | -21.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 24.33% | -19.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 24.33% | -19.09% |
PFIG vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFIG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFIG vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison
PFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than BESF's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 5.68% | 6.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFIG Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.40% | 4.15% | 4.12% | 3.54% | 2.58% | 3.34% | 2.81% | 2.92% | 2.88% | 2.54% | 2.58% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFIG and BESF have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PFIG is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PFIG is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.
BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 4.40% for PFIG.
PFIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for PFIG and 0.80% for BESF.
Find the right allocation for PFIG and BESF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer