PFI vs. DCMT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PFI (Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFI is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Financials Technical Leaders Index, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. PFI is passively managed, while DCMT is actively managed. Over the past year, PFI returned 12.93% vs 28.33% for DCMT. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. PFI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

PFI vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFI achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 25.74% return.

PFI

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 2.23%
• 6M: 4.69%
• YTD: 7.70%
• 1Y: 12.93%
• 3Y*: 14.47%
• 5Y*: 6.05%
• 10Y*: 8.68%

DCMT

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -0.52%
• 6M: 21.60%
• YTD: 25.74%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFI vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PFI Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF	7.70%	1.98%	30.58%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	25.74%	6.04%	3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PFI and DCMT is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	-0.02

The correlation between PFI and DCMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PFI vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFI

PFI Risk / Return Rank: 24
PFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
PFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
PFI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
PFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
PFI Martin Ratio Rank: 26

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 51
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 53
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFI vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFI	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	1.52	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	2.11	-1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.27	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	1.78	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.83	6.45	-3.63

PFI vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFI and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PFI vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFI drawdown since its inception was -59.53%, which is greater than DCMT's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFI and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFI	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.53%	-15.96%	-43.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.86%	-15.96%	+2.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-9.74%	+8.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.43%	-3.51%	-10.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.58%	4.40%	+0.18%

Volatility

PFI vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) is 4.86%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that PFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFI	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.86%	6.10%	-1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.94%	16.86%	-2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.85%	18.80%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.78%	16.03%	+5.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.27%	16.03%	+6.24%

PFI vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFI vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

PFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than DCMT's 2.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.92%	3.67%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PFI Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF	0.99%	0.68%	2.77%	1.85%	1.93%	1.28%	1.56%	0.92%	1.98%	0.35%	2.16%	1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFI and DCMT in my portfolio?

PFI and DCMT have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFI or DCMT?

DCMT has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to PFI (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFI dropped -59.53% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

Which ETF is better, PFI or DCMT?

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 28.33% vs 12.93% for PFI. On fees, PFI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PFI has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PFI or DCMT?

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 28.33% return vs 12.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFI or DCMT?

PFI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFI or DCMT?

DCMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 0.99% for PFI.

What is the main difference between PFI and DCMT?

PFI is categorized as Momentum, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PFI and 0.66% for DCMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.