PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFV vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFV vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFV achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -7.27% return.


PFFV

1D
0.00%
1M
0.15%
6M
1.43%
YTD
3.03%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-0.61%
1M
-5.92%
6M
-22.32%
YTD
-7.27%
1Y
-0.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFV vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PFFV
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
3.03%2.08%9.45%4.56%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-7.27%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFV and SHLD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFV vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFV
PFFV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PFFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFV Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFV Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFV vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFVSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.01

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

-0.03

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

-0.08

+3.46

PFFV vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFV Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFV and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFFV vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFV drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFV and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFVSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-25.40%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.23%

-25.40%

+22.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-22.99%

+22.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-3.90%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

10.30%

-9.14%

Volatility

PFFV vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) is 1.46%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that PFFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFVSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

8.28%

-6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.07%

19.79%

-16.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.09%

25.12%

-21.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.86%

21.54%

-12.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.62%

21.54%

-12.92%

PFFV vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFV vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

PFFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than SHLD's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
PFFV
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
8.12%8.26%7.33%7.17%6.60%5.23%2.29%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.71%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFV and SHLD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to PFFV (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFV dropped -18.96% vs SHLD's -25.40%.

On 1-year performance, PFFV leads with 3.92% vs -0.87% for SHLD. On fees, PFFV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PFFV has been the lower-risk option at 1.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PFFV has performed better with a 3.92% return vs -0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFFV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHLD.

PFFV has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 0.71% for SHLD.

PFFV is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. PFFV tracks ICE U.S. Variable Rate Preferred Securities Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PFFV and 0.50% for SHLD.

PFFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFV and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer